What rights do performing animals have?

“With a circus in town again, I cannot but wonder whether there is any protection for the animals that have to perform in the circus. I’m not saying they are being mistreated, but surely their treatment cannot be left only to the discretion of the circus owners?”

A circus is a show that often features live animal performances. Our legislature has long recognised that these animals need protection and already in 1935 promulgated the Protection of Performing Animals Act (“PAPA”) to regulate the exhibition and training of performing animals. At the beginning of this year amendments to PAPA were published which seeks to amend sections 2 and 3 of PAPA which were declared constitutionally invalid as they allowed Magistrates to consider and issue licenses under PAPA. The amendment act has however not yet commenced in order to provide Government the opportunity to establish a national licencing authority that will issue licences for the exhibition or training of animals.

In terms of PAPA, any person involved in the exhibition or training of animals (such as a circus owner) must obtain a valid license in terms of PAPA to do so. To obtain such a licence, very specific guidelines for the treatment of animals must be followed and the licence will only be issued if these guidelines are complied with and the applicant is deemed fit and proper to obtain such a license. 

The premises where the performing animals are kept may also be inspected for compliance with the terms and conditions of the licence. Any non-compliance or failure to possess a licence may result in an offence leading to a fine or imprisonment for up to 12 months.

As with all things, the protection measures are there, but it is also the responsibility of the public to be wary of any abuse and report such to the authorities who can take the necessary measures to ensure protection of vulnerable animals that cannot do so for themselves.

March 8, 2017
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest