Dividing your business for BEE purposes

“I have heard that in terms of the new BEE Codes an entity with a turnover of under R10 million will qualify for an automatic level 4 BEE certificate and does not have to undergo verification. My company currently has two divisions with a combined turnover of around R12 million. Can I split my company into two separate businesses with each part having a turnover of less than R10 million?”

Any splitting of your business purely for BEE purposes may constitute an offence in terms of the New BEE Codes. The drafters foresaw that a business may be enticed to split into smaller units in order to circumvent their BEE responsibilities and accordingly criminalized any such conduct. This does not mean that you can never divide or reorganise your business. It just means that if you cannot show a good commercial reason for having done so or cannot explain your timing, then you run the risk of being guilty of an offence under the BEE Act. Verification agencies will also be on the lookout for businesses that have changed their structures and will be asking hard questions of the owners, which, if not properly answered, may lead to charges being brought in terms of the BEE Act.

The BEE Act states that any person found guilty of an offence in terms of the Act may be liable for a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 10 years, or both a fine and imprisonment. The amount of any fine will be determined by looking at the value of any transactions which were the result or the intended result of the commission of the offence. Any person found guilty of an offence in terms of the BEE Act will also be prohibited from doing business with any organs of state for a period of 10 years from the date of conviction.

So, although splitting your business may appear a good way to side-step many of the obligations that accompany a business having to be verified, it could have dire consequences for you if such a step is taken purely to avoid your BEE obligations. Rather timeously engage BEE support to help you prepare a proper plan for your business, and which allows you to obtain a good BEE level and keep your business reputation intact. 

December 14, 2015
Slip and trip: who is liable?

Slip and trip: who is liable?

With a growing number of ‘slip and trip’ cases being referred to our courts, property owners must understand what they need to do to avoid liability for injuries sustained on their property. In this article, we examine the recent case of Ngwenya vs Accelerate Property Fund (2022/13159) [2024] ZAGPJHC 880 to explore the latest rulings regarding property owner liability.

Developers caught off guard with sectional title costs

Developers caught off guard with sectional title costs

In the recent case of Club Kerkira (Pty) Limited v Trustees of Club Kerkira Body Corporate and Others (D11451/2021) [2024] ZAKZDHC 40, the KZN High Court had to clarify the position as to whether the holder of a real right of extension (in this case the developer) had a responsibility to contribute towards the maintenance costs of the sectional title scheme.

See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

Enforcing workplace rules frequently relies on employees reporting misconduct that they have witnessed by fellow employees to their employer. This is vital for maintaining workplace discipline and ensuring that employees adhere to the employer’s rules. But what is the worst that can happen to an employee who elects to protect a fellow employee by keeping quiet about their transgressions?

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest