Implications of the new Construction BEE Charter on construction material suppliers

"My company supplies construction materials and in the past I have always been verified under the general BEE Codes with my BEE verification. Will this still be the case in terms of the new Construction BEE Charter? If not, what effect will this have on my business?”

The draft Construction BEE Charter (“Construction Charter”) was published for public comment in October 2016 with publication of the final version expected soon. The draft Construction Charter makes it clear that construction material suppliers will now have to be verified under the Construction Charter (when it is finally published) and not under the general BEE Codes of the Department of Trade and Industry, as these suppliers have done in the past.

It is anticipated that suppliers of construction materials may be in for a challenge in having to comply with the Construction Charter based on the provisions of the published draft. The draft Construction Charter contains a number of provisions which require the reporting entity to report on their compliance with targets relating to the number of registered Black professionals employed by the entity. Although these provisions should not be too problematic for other entities which fall under the Construction Charter, such as engineering and architecture firms who require registration with their professional bodies, no professionally qualified persons are in essence required to operate a material supply company. Yet it does not at present appear from the draft, that these suppliers will be able to sidestep compliance with these provisions.

This requirement affects also the Management and Skills Development elements, both of which now contain targets relating to professional registration. A construction material supplier such as yourself will therefore have to take cognisance of this new requirement, as non-compliance could in our estimation result in a loss of up to two BEE levels if these provisions are not met.

When one considers that your BEE level is more important than ever for government tenders under the new Preferential Procurement Regulations, a potential loss of two BEE levels is a distinct disadvantage faced by construction material suppliers and impacting on their competitiveness. Whether these provisions will remain will only be clear once the final Construction Charter is promulgated, but in the interim it would be wise for construction material suppliers to monitor the situation and commence their planning for compliance, should these provisions remain in the final Construction Charter.

April 5, 2017
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest