Contact
BEE | Business | Consumer

Opportunities under the new Forestry Sector BEE Code

“I have a small black-owned business providing timber and poles to contractors and supply shops. I understand that the new Forestry Sector BEE Code is aimed at creating more opportunities for businesses working in this sector. Is this so?”

The amended Forestry Sector BEE Code (“Amended Forestry Code”) has been gazetted and is in force without a transition period. This means that all enterprises in this sector will immediately upon their next BEE rating be required to meet the requirements of the Amended Forestry Code. Certificates issued under the old Forestry Sector Code will still be valid until their expiry 12 months after their issue date. 

The Amended Forestry Code applies to all enterprises involved in commercial forestry and first level processing of wood products, and covers sub-sectors such as growers, forestry contractors, sawmilling, timber board and paper producers, pole treatment plants, charcoal producers, and non-timber enterprises such as honey, medical plant producers and forestry tourism enterprises.

The Amended Forestry Code prioritises the empowerment of designated groups, such as broad-based schemes, employment share ownership plans and communities, under the ownership element. This is evidenced by the higher ownership targets for designated groups (7.5%) from the 3% under the Generic BEE Codes of Good Practice. The Amended Forestry Code is targeted towards rural development as generally most enterprises in this sector tend to be situated in rural and under-developed areas. 

The Amended Forestry Code also provides for an increase in the allocation of points for enterprise development emphasizing the focus on the development and support of black-owned Exempted Micro Enterprises (EMEs) and Qualifying Small Enterprises (QSEs) in this sector. Interposed throughout the Amended Forestry Code are further elements aimed at promoting these objectives, such as the provision for recognition of unincorporated joint ventures, linkages between enterprise and supplier development and a focus on the growth of black women-owned enterprises.

If you review the objectives of the Amended Forestry Code it would appear that a small black-owned business such as yours that works in this sector, is ideally positioned to capitalize from the increased focus on enterprise and rural development. I would advise engaging a BEE specialist to help you understand the opportunities on offer and how to position your business to make best use of the opportunities that could flow to businesses in this sector.

 
June 9, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest