Phatshoane Henney Group spends R1 million on Enterprise Development

The Phatshoane Henney Group of Associated Law Firms has raised and invested R1 million on Enterprise Development with the Cadiz Enterprise Development Investment (“CENT”) fund in furtherance of its commitment to advancing the broad-based principles of BEE.

CENT in turn invests into Black owned businesses that address some of South Africa’s largest social problems, such as a lack of decent housing and basic services, poor transport infrastructure and access to areas of economic opportunity, as well as high rates of unemployment. 

“We are proud as a group to have raised and contributed the significant sum of R1 million to the CENT fund and believe that this money will help contribute to meaningful enterprise development across some of the key sectors requiring the support of the private sector. We purposefully chose CENT for the range of sectors in which they invest and their robust approach to identifying and supporting these projects” says Douglas Henney, Chair of the Phatshoane Henney Group.

CENT, shortly after Phatshoane Henney Group’s R1 million investment in April, funded an NGO called the Clothing Bank. The funding provided by CENT enabled the Clothing Bank to purchase their own premises from where they donate excess garments to registered Non Profit Organisations for the benefit of clothing those in the care of these organisations. They currently support over 70 organisations within the Western Cape, which includes orphanages, old age homes, women’s shelters, homeless shelters, disaster relief and many more.
In addition, the Clothing Bank enables further enterprise development by empowering unemployed mothers with the skills to become financially as well as socially independent. Self-employment is seen as a solution to the structural unemployment problems that are facing women living in low-income areas in South Africa, which is why the Clothing Bank addresses the need for more business-focused education and support as these women grow sustainable micro businesses.
At the end of last year a large chunk of CENT’s investments went toward providing working capital for SMEs. A sizable investment was also allocated towards SME microfinance as a particularly effective way to support micro-entrepreneurs, particularly in rural areas where there is little opportunity to find formal employment.

Large investments were also made in the affordable housing, transport, ICT, waste management and industrial sectors resulting in several job opportunities for entrepreneurs in small and micro businesses. As a result CENT has, since its inception in November 2012, created an additional 3 600 jobs. Of these, 2 574 are a direct result of CENT’s lending, while another 1026 jobs have been created indirectly.

The substantial investment by the Phatshoane Henney Group in enterprise development through CENT was made possible by the support each member firm and demonstrates the commitment of group firms towards the development and support of new enterprise and socio-economic initiatives. 

May 12, 2015
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest