The drive to transform under the new Property Practitioners Act

With all the media focus lately on the new Property Practitioners Act and new regulations and requirements regarding Fidelity Fund certificates, it’s easy to miss the impact this Act intends to make on much-needed transformation of the property sector. Here we highlight a few of the key measures that will impact on transformation in the property industry.

The Act reconfirms that the Property Sector BEE Transformation Charter Code applies to all property practitioners that fall within the scope of the Act and also encourages organs of state to procure services from property practitioners that comply with transformation and equity legislation.

The Act also states that the Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority must implement measures that promote a more inclusive and integrated property sector and establishes a Property Sector Transformation Fund for the receipt of grants to among others be used to promote transformation and empowerment programmes within the sector.

Also of relevance, is the Property Sector Research Centre that has a mandate to look at identifying barriers to entry to the property sector by historically disadvantaged individuals as well as the demographic distribution of skills in the sector.

And lastly, an item that will undoubtedly have an impact on transformation in the sector is the linking of the requirement that property practitioners must have a valid BEE certificate in order to renew their Fidelity Fund certificates. This will certainly place pressure on the industry to address transformation more aggressively through the BEE verification process or risk not obtaining a Fidelity Fund certificate so critical to doing business.

Although just the highlights, property practitioners and role players should be convinced that addressing and prioritising transformation will be highly relevant not only in the sector but also to individual practices and businesses that operate within the industry, justifying engaging with specialists that can provide guidance on how to align your practice and business with this transformation drive.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 13, 2022
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest