The drive to transform under the new Property Practitioners Act

With all the media focus lately on the new Property Practitioners Act and new regulations and requirements regarding Fidelity Fund certificates, it’s easy to miss the impact this Act intends to make on much-needed transformation of the property sector. Here we highlight a few of the key measures that will impact on transformation in the property industry.

The Act reconfirms that the Property Sector BEE Transformation Charter Code applies to all property practitioners that fall within the scope of the Act and also encourages organs of state to procure services from property practitioners that comply with transformation and equity legislation.

The Act also states that the Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority must implement measures that promote a more inclusive and integrated property sector and establishes a Property Sector Transformation Fund for the receipt of grants to among others be used to promote transformation and empowerment programmes within the sector.

Also of relevance, is the Property Sector Research Centre that has a mandate to look at identifying barriers to entry to the property sector by historically disadvantaged individuals as well as the demographic distribution of skills in the sector.

And lastly, an item that will undoubtedly have an impact on transformation in the sector is the linking of the requirement that property practitioners must have a valid BEE certificate in order to renew their Fidelity Fund certificates. This will certainly place pressure on the industry to address transformation more aggressively through the BEE verification process or risk not obtaining a Fidelity Fund certificate so critical to doing business.

Although just the highlights, property practitioners and role players should be convinced that addressing and prioritising transformation will be highly relevant not only in the sector but also to individual practices and businesses that operate within the industry, justifying engaging with specialists that can provide guidance on how to align your practice and business with this transformation drive.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 13, 2022
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest