Is surrogacy allowed in South Africa?

“Because I am medically unable to give birth to a child, my husband and I have talked about the option of surrogacy. We have discussed it with my sister and she has said she is willing to consider it. We’ve not yet spoken about costs or payment for her to do this, because we’re not sure whether surrogacy is allowed in South Africa. Is surrogacy an option we can consider?”

Surrogacy is allowed in South Africa and is regulated by the Childrens Act. The Children’s Act contains strict prerequisites which parents must satisfy before entering into a surrogacy agreement. These prerequisites include (but are not limited to only these): 

The commissioning parent or parents are not able to give birth to a child and the condition is permanent and irreversible;
They must be competent to enter into a surrogate agreement;
They must be suitable parents to take care of a child; and 
They must accept the legal consequences of the agreement between them and the surrogate mother.

It is very important to note that no person may in connection with a surrogate motherhood agreement give or promise to give to any person, or receive from any person, a reward or compensation in cash or in kind. The only compensation or payment allowed is compensation for expenses that relate directly to the artificial fertilisation and pregnancy of the surrogate mother, the birth of the child, confirmation of the surrogate motherhood agreement, loss of earnings suffered by the surrogate mother, or insurance to cover the surrogate mother for anything that may lead to death or disability brought about by the pregnancy.

The surrogate mother also has to tick certain boxes. She must, for example, have a documented history of at least one pregnancy and viable delivery, have one living child of her own, and it must be apparent that she is not using the surrogacy as a source of income.

No surrogacy in South Africa, even if the above requirements are met, will be valid without a valid surrogate motherhood agreement which is in writing, signed by all the parties thereto, and entered into in South Africa and confirmed by the High Court within whose area of jurisdiction the particular parents are domiciled or habitually resident. The surrogate motherhood agreement will only be confirmed once all of the abovementioned restrictions and requirements as required by the Children’s Act have been met and the agreement includes adequate provisions for the contact, care, upbringing, general welfare and best interest of the child.

Before you consider surrogacy as an option, it is recommended that you consult a family law specialist to discuss the requirements for a valid surrogate motherhood agreement.

June 9, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest