Sustainable forest management in South Africa

Every South African citizen has the Constitutional right for the environment to be protected for future generations. Natural forests, wooded areas and plantations form an important part of South Africa’s ecology and economy and, as such, it is important that these natural resources are managed in a sustainable manner.

The National Forests Act (the Act) is the main piece of legislation that is applicable to the regulation of sustainable forestry.  The Act was compiled and promulgated in the same era as various other pieces of environmental legislation, such as the National Environmental Management Act and the National Water Act and, as such, forms part of a network of legislation aimed at regulating the sustainable management of natural resources.

The aim of the Act, is broadly, to protect wooded areas, endangered forests and tree species and to promote community involvement in sustainable forestry.  The Act protects natural forests, wooded areas, plantations (but not orchards), any yields from these areas and the ecosystems of which these areas form a part of.

The entity responsible for the implementation and enforcement of the Act is the Department of Environment, Fisheries and Forestry (the Department).  The powers vested in the Department by the Act include the authority to establish certain measures, standards and criteria with which any person or entity that is involved in forestry must comply.

The Department also has the power to declare certain areas and tree species as protected, and to identify which areas and species include special protection under the Act and which may not be cut down, damaged, destroyed, disturbed, removed, transported, bought, sold or in any other way obtained, except if a special license in terms of the Act is issued for such action or if one of the Act’s exclusions is applicable.

The Department is furthermore vested with the power to request the Registrar of Deeds to bring about an endorsement on the title deed of the land on which a protected area or tree species is found, which endorsement would notify prospective transferees of the property that a protected species or area is found on the land. 

Even though the Department’s powers and authorities in terms of the Act is wide, the execution of the Department’s powers is heavily regulated by the Act.  The Act makes provision for certain principles that officials of the Department must take into account before a decision in terms of the Act is made. These principles include the following:

– Natural forests must, as far as possible, not be destroyed.  As such, natural forests may only be destroyed in exceptional cases where the Department is of the opinion that the destruction (and the proposed new use of the land) is justified on economic, social and ecological grounds.

– A minimum quantity of each type of forest and tree species may not be destroyed; and

– Forests and wooded areas must be managed in such a way that the biological diversity, ecosystems and habitat that they form a part of stay protected, that the potential economic, social and ecological advantages connected thereto are managed sustainably, that the health of forests and wooded areas is promoted and that other natural resources, such as water and land, are protected.

Lastly, it is also important to take note that, should a person or entity fail to take heed of the provisions of the Act, such person or entity may be punished by means of a fine, compulsory community service, imprisonment for a maximum of 3 years or a combination of these punishments.

 

This article is intended for information purposes only and is a brief exposition of the abovementioned legal position. Mention is not necessarily made of all the finer nuances as set out in the abovementioned legislation. This article should under no circumstances be construed as formal legal advice. Contact VDT Attorneys for assistance in this regard. 

December 8, 2020
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest