The ‘when’, ‘who’ and ‘how’ of taking valid company resolutions

“I’ve purchased a shareholding stake in my dad’s family business. I’ve been part of the family business for some time but now I’m a shareholder and clueless as to the basics of how the company’s shareholders are supposed to take decisions. What should I know about company resolutions?”

A company is a juristic person and can only act through its shareholders and directors. For now I will discuss the position regarding the taking of shareholder decisions or ‘resolutions’, and provide a brief overview of the default position established by the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the “Act”). 

Shareholders have the right to vote at meetings of shareholders, but are not primarily responsible for the management of the company. The company’s board of directors (“board”), except to the extent that the Act or the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (“MOI”) provides otherwise, has the authority to manage and control the company’s day-to-day business and affairs.

The board or any other person specified in the company’s MOI may call a meeting of the company’s shareholders at any time. Section 61 of the Act also lists the grounds when a company must hold a shareholders meeting. A meeting must be properly convened by means of a written notice setting out (among others) the date, time, venue and matters up for consideration. The notice must be delivered to all shareholders at least 10 business days before the meeting is to commence in the case of a private company and 15 business days in the case of a public company or a non-profit company. The notice must also contain copies of all proposed resolutions to be taken as well as a notice of the percentage of voting rights required for any specific resolution to be adopted. 

On the date of the meeting and before commencement thereof, the attendees, or the chairperson (if one is elected), must ensure that holders representing at least 25% of the voting rights that can be exercised on at least one matter on the agenda for the meeting, are present. The Act further requires that a matter may not begin to be considered unless persons representing at least 25% of the voting rights which may be exercised on that matter are present when the matter is called on the agenda. The MOI may however set a lower or higher percentage in either or both cases.

The next step is establishing a person quorum for the meeting. This requires that, regardless of the votes quorum, should the company have more than two shareholders, a meeting may not begin and a matter may not begin to be considered, unless at least three shareholders are present at the meeting. The identities of all shareholders and/or their proxies (persons duly authorised to speak and vote on behalf of a shareholder) are then verified.

In the event that a quorum, whether a votes quorum or person quorum, is not present within one hour after the time at which the shareholders’ meeting is scheduled to begin, the Act provides for an automatic postponement of the meeting for a period of one week (unless modified by the MOI) and the shareholders then present at such postponed meeting shall be deemed to constitute a quorum.

Voting on any matter up for consideration and authorised for voting by the shareholders in terms of the Act or the MOI, may occur, either by way of a show of hands whereby each shareholder is entitled to one vote only, or by polling the holders present and entitled to vote on a matter. On a poll, the holders must be entitled to exercise all the voting rights attached to the shares held or represented by that person. 

Generally, with regards to voting, the majority principle applies. Most matters, from a shareholders perspective however, will require an ordinary majority (50% plus 1) although some matters like amending the company’s MOI may require a special resolution (75%).

It is therefore very important to consult your MOI and also read the relevant provisions of the Act to familiarise yourself with the rights and duties of a shareholder. If necessary, obtain advice from a corporate specialist that can help guide you in understanding your shareholder rights.

December 14, 2016
Mediation – a go-to option for divorcing couples

Mediation – a go-to option for divorcing couples

At the heart of divorce proceedings, lies an intense personal battle between spouses. Enter mediation as a growing alternative dispute resolution mechanism aiming to preserve relationships and protect the psychological and emotional well-being of children and adults by avoiding drawn-out and combative court proceedings. In this article, we take a brief look at mediation as a go-to option for divorcing couples in South Africa.

Outstanding charges, body corporates and sales in execution

Outstanding charges, body corporates and sales in execution

Recently our Supreme Court of Appeal had to consider whether a purchaser was entitled to only pay for outstanding levies of a sectional title property that was sold in an execution sale or also the other outstanding charges such as water, sewerage etc. where the terms of the execution sale only required payment of the outstanding levies. In effect, the court had to consider whether a body corporate could be forced to accept a lesser amount because of the terms of a sale in execution.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest