Bye-bye exemption clauses?

When a consumer and supplier conclude a contract, it is easy for a consumer to concern himself with the apparent key provisions of the contract such as the contract value, duration, payment terms, delivery dates etc. and not focus on clauses dealing with the exemption of liability of the supplier. In the past these exemption clauses were often one-sided, unfair and biased against the consumer prejudicially affecting the rights of the consumer against whom the exemptions were enforced. With the advent of the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) these clauses have been curbed. But are they completely outlawed, or can contracts still have exemption clauses?

The CPA was drafted to protect the consumer against illegal business practices, particularly where an unfair or unequal relationship exists between a consumer and supplier.

The CPA specifically prohibits suppliers from imposing exemption clauses on consumers that require a consumer to waive any rights; assume any obligation; or waive any the liability of the supplier on terms that are unfair, unreasonable or unjust or impose any such terms as a condition of entering into a transaction.

Section 49 of the CPA further provides that certain types of terms and notices in which there is a limitation of the risk or liability of a supplier, or where the consumer assumes a risk or liability, or where the consumer is required to indemnify the supplier, or where the consumer has to make an acknowledgement of any fact, must be written in plain language and the existence of the terms must be drawn to the consumer’s attention in a conspicuous manner and form that is likely to attract the attention of an ordinary alert consumer. Accordingly, it is insufficient to print this type of clause in small print in a place in the contract where the consumer cannot reasonably be expected to notice the terms. However, if the exemption clause is printed in contrasting typeface, or in bold, close to the primary terms of the contract where it is likely to be noticed by any consumer who reads the primary terms, this may be sufficient to comply with this requirement.

Furthermore a supplier seeking protection of an exemption clause in a contract will need to draw the exemption clause to the consumer’s attention at the negotiating stage of the contract and not after the conclusion thereof. This would require that the consumer’s attention be drawn to the specific highlighted clauses in the contract that hold risk for the consumer.

Where exemption clauses are inserted in a contract that do not meet the above requirements, the CPA allows the court to make an order severing the provisions or notices from the contract or declaring it to have no force or effect with respect to the transaction.

The CPA has thus introduced a balanced negotiation process between consumers and suppliers seeking to enter into contracts. Blatant unfair and unreasonable limitation of the rights of a consumer entering into a contract has now been removed, with any remaining exemptions required to comply strictly with the notice requirements of the CPA, curbing exemption clause abuse as encountered in the past.

As a consumer you must be aware of your rights. When entering a contract with its exemption clauses highlighted and brought to your attention, don’t just assume that the risks are appropriate. Consider the provisions carefully and understand the risks you are signing up for. Where you are unsure of the implications, rather obtain legal advice and gain a complete understanding. It may seem tedious, but it is better to be safe than sorry.

May 6, 2014
Maritime Piracy and South African Law

Maritime Piracy and South African Law

Over the past decade, piracy on the high seas and off the coast of Somalia has been on the rise. Although there have been preventative measures deployed by maritime nations to counter the crime, across the seas, there is an identified need to develop an efficient regime to prosecute pirates with “pirates” long being described as hostes humani generis (enemies of all humankind).

Act! Prevent abuse and domestic violence

Act! Prevent abuse and domestic violence

With such high crime statistics being attributed to violent crimes occurring between people who know each other, it is sadly also the case that silent abuse happens in the confines and privacy of many homes. Such can take the form of physical, sexual, emotional, verbal, psychological and economic abuse, intimidation, harassment, stalking, damage to personal belongings or entry into a residence without consent by an unwanted relative, boyfriend or girlfriend who shares or recently shared the same residence with the affected person, or any other controlling or abusive behaviour towards a complainant, where such conduct harms, or may cause imminent harm to, the safety, health or wellbeing of the complainant.

Divorce mediation as an option

Divorce mediation as an option

The dissolution of marriage in South Africa is regulated by our Divorce Act and the Matrimonial Property Act. These acts do not require parties contemplating divorce to enter into divorce mediation. However, our courts have recently started increasing the pressure on legal practitioners to advise their clients to enter into divorce mediation before the parties are to appear in court. This pressure is evidenced in a number of recent judgments made by our courts and reflects a growing sentiment that divorce mediation is an important step in divorce proceedings.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest