Consumer complaints can no longer be ignored

I recently bought ready-mix cement at a chain hardware store. I followed the instructions carefully in mixing the cement, but when I started pouring it the consistency was clearly not right and it would not set. I went back to the hardware store to complain that the cement quality was unsatisfactory, but the store clerk said he couldn’t help me and that I must write a letter to the store with my complaint and attach photos, which I then did but have still not heard from them. Surely they are required to respond to a written complaint and cannot just ignore me?

In short, you are correct and the store cannot just ignore you. Your frustration is such a common encounter that the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (“CPA”) was promulgated to help protect consumers. Recently, this protection was further expanded by the Consumer Goods and Services Industry Code of Conduct (“Code of Conduct”) published in terms of the CPA which Code of Conduct now also established the Consumer Goods and Services Ombud (“Ombud”).

The Code of Conduct applies to just about all consumer transactions regulated by the CPA (which is just about most commercial transactions a consumer will undertake with a business) and to all suppliers selling goods or services to consumers. The Code of Conduct does however exclude transactions that are governed by other specific public regulations such as the automotive industry, electronic communication services and transactions with organs of state or financial institutions.

The Code of Conduct serves to inform consumers of the various consumer rights available to them and is aimed at helping reduce the disadvantage often experienced by consumers when trying to enforce their rights against a business, as well as protect consumers from unfair trade practices.

The Ombud has also been established to provide a dispute resolution mechanism for disputes arising from consumer transactions. The Ombud can be approached free of charge to help address a dispute laid by a consumer. The Ombud is also responsible to help create awareness of consumer rights and the responsibilities of suppliers to act in accordance with the CPA and Code of Conduct. 

In terms of the Code of Conduct all suppliers are also required to establish internal complaints-handling procedures for dealing with customer complaints. The adherence to the Code of Conduct must be displayed prominently at the place of business as well as on its website and a copy of the Code of Conduct (or summary thereof) and the supplier’s internal complaints-handling process must be made available to any consumer upon request, or the consumer must be directed to where to obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct and/or the internal complaints-handling process. The contact details of the Ombud should also be displayed for consumers who wish to make use of its dispute resolution procedures where the supplier’s complaints procedures did not satisfactorily address the consumer’s complaint. The complaints procedures and process for managing consumer complaints must also be well-communicated to staff of the supplier and staff must be trained in effectively dealing with complaints and/or consumer disputes. 

The Code of Conduct and the Ombud will go a long way in assisting consumers like yourself to be aware of the process for lodging a compliant and having a complaint dealt with effectively – and so avoid the frustration of a business that does not wish to try and address a customer’s complaint or tries to make you jump through hoops before they will listen to you. 

July 16, 2015
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest