Consumer complaints can no longer be ignored

I recently bought ready-mix cement at a chain hardware store. I followed the instructions carefully in mixing the cement, but when I started pouring it the consistency was clearly not right and it would not set. I went back to the hardware store to complain that the cement quality was unsatisfactory, but the store clerk said he couldn’t help me and that I must write a letter to the store with my complaint and attach photos, which I then did but have still not heard from them. Surely they are required to respond to a written complaint and cannot just ignore me?

In short, you are correct and the store cannot just ignore you. Your frustration is such a common encounter that the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (“CPA”) was promulgated to help protect consumers. Recently, this protection was further expanded by the Consumer Goods and Services Industry Code of Conduct (“Code of Conduct”) published in terms of the CPA which Code of Conduct now also established the Consumer Goods and Services Ombud (“Ombud”).

The Code of Conduct applies to just about all consumer transactions regulated by the CPA (which is just about most commercial transactions a consumer will undertake with a business) and to all suppliers selling goods or services to consumers. The Code of Conduct does however exclude transactions that are governed by other specific public regulations such as the automotive industry, electronic communication services and transactions with organs of state or financial institutions.

The Code of Conduct serves to inform consumers of the various consumer rights available to them and is aimed at helping reduce the disadvantage often experienced by consumers when trying to enforce their rights against a business, as well as protect consumers from unfair trade practices.

The Ombud has also been established to provide a dispute resolution mechanism for disputes arising from consumer transactions. The Ombud can be approached free of charge to help address a dispute laid by a consumer. The Ombud is also responsible to help create awareness of consumer rights and the responsibilities of suppliers to act in accordance with the CPA and Code of Conduct. 

In terms of the Code of Conduct all suppliers are also required to establish internal complaints-handling procedures for dealing with customer complaints. The adherence to the Code of Conduct must be displayed prominently at the place of business as well as on its website and a copy of the Code of Conduct (or summary thereof) and the supplier’s internal complaints-handling process must be made available to any consumer upon request, or the consumer must be directed to where to obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct and/or the internal complaints-handling process. The contact details of the Ombud should also be displayed for consumers who wish to make use of its dispute resolution procedures where the supplier’s complaints procedures did not satisfactorily address the consumer’s complaint. The complaints procedures and process for managing consumer complaints must also be well-communicated to staff of the supplier and staff must be trained in effectively dealing with complaints and/or consumer disputes. 

The Code of Conduct and the Ombud will go a long way in assisting consumers like yourself to be aware of the process for lodging a compliant and having a complaint dealt with effectively – and so avoid the frustration of a business that does not wish to try and address a customer’s complaint or tries to make you jump through hoops before they will listen to you. 

July 16, 2015
When agreements have limits

When agreements have limits

Maintenance agreements in South Africa have become increasingly popular between parents of minor children as a means of regulating their respective maintenance obligations outside of court. These agreements are a useful tool, allowing parents to exercise a degree of contractual freedom. However, their provisions remain subject to statutory regulation and the overarching principle that contracts must conform to public policy.

Fee or tax? The court decides

Fee or tax? The court decides

With effect from 1 July 2025, the City of Cape Town introduced three new charges on residential rate bills. These charges were challenged by the South African Property Owners’ Association (SAPOA) and AfriForum, who argued that they were unlawful and improperly calculated. The dispute culminated in court applications seeking declaratory orders that the charges were invalid because they were inconsistent with the Constitution, national legislation, and the City’s own By-Laws.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest