Email scammed? Who is responsible?

“I recently fell for an email scam where I provided my banking details. The scammer proceeded to use my account to pay out a sum of money from the bank. The bank now wants to hold me liable for this money as they say it is my account and my negligence led to the scammers using my account. However, I don’t have a credit facility with the bank and yet the bank paid out a large amount in credit on my behalf. Surely the bank should not have done that?”

Cyber scamming is at an all time high, with scammers becoming increasingly sophisticated in their approaches to victims. But where does it leave you if you get scammed? Are all the resultant damages flowing from the scam yours to bear, or does your bank also have to shoulder some responsibility?

Firstly, it should be clearly stated, that it is very difficult to formulate a one-size-fits-all answer for this, as every situation may have different circumstances that could affect the ultimate responsibility.

In general though, an individual account holder is contractually required to protect and keep private his or her sensitive account details and not share such with anyone. If you then fall foul of a scam and so divulge information that the scammers use to hack your account and use it to cause damage either to yourself or the bank, there is a good chance you will be liable for the resultant damage. 

That said, your bank has a reciprocal duty to protect your interests and ensure they act within what was agreed with you in respect of your account. Our courts have confirmed that if your account for example does not have a credit facility, but the bank paid out credit to a third party, even though such payment was initiated by scammers using your account details obtained from you through a scam, the bank acted outside their mandate and is therefore also negligent. 

In your situation, it is therefore important that you engage with your bank to ascertain exactly what happened and why money was paid out, and if necessary, consult your attorney to assist you in dealing with the matter on your behalf.

October 12, 2021
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest