Email scammed? Who is responsible?

“I recently fell for an email scam where I provided my banking details. The scammer proceeded to use my account to pay out a sum of money from the bank. The bank now wants to hold me liable for this money as they say it is my account and my negligence led to the scammers using my account. However, I don’t have a credit facility with the bank and yet the bank paid out a large amount in credit on my behalf. Surely the bank should not have done that?”

Cyber scamming is at an all time high, with scammers becoming increasingly sophisticated in their approaches to victims. But where does it leave you if you get scammed? Are all the resultant damages flowing from the scam yours to bear, or does your bank also have to shoulder some responsibility?

Firstly, it should be clearly stated, that it is very difficult to formulate a one-size-fits-all answer for this, as every situation may have different circumstances that could affect the ultimate responsibility.

In general though, an individual account holder is contractually required to protect and keep private his or her sensitive account details and not share such with anyone. If you then fall foul of a scam and so divulge information that the scammers use to hack your account and use it to cause damage either to yourself or the bank, there is a good chance you will be liable for the resultant damage. 

That said, your bank has a reciprocal duty to protect your interests and ensure they act within what was agreed with you in respect of your account. Our courts have confirmed that if your account for example does not have a credit facility, but the bank paid out credit to a third party, even though such payment was initiated by scammers using your account details obtained from you through a scam, the bank acted outside their mandate and is therefore also negligent. 

In your situation, it is therefore important that you engage with your bank to ascertain exactly what happened and why money was paid out, and if necessary, consult your attorney to assist you in dealing with the matter on your behalf.

October 12, 2021
Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

Customary and Civil marriages are equal, says Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court has recently delivered a significant judgment reaffirming that customary marriages and civil marriages hold equal legal status. Importantly, the Court clarified the implications and validity of antenuptial contracts within the context of customary marriages.

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

CSOS or Court? The choice is yours

The recent judgment in Parch Properties 72 (Pty) Ltd v Summervale Lifestyle Estate Owner’s Association and Others 2026 (1) SA 449 (SCA) (17 October 2025) has brought welcome clarity to the long‑standing question of whether the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) limits the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Hurt feelings ≠ Constructive dismissal

Constructive dismissal was incorporated into South African labour law in the 1980s and later codified in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA”). In terms of section 186(1)(e) of the LRA, an employee may resign, whether with or without notice, and claim unfair dismissal on the basis that their continued employment had become intolerable. Although the concept can be difficult to apply in practice, the Constitutional Court has clarified its meaning and reaffirmed its role within our law.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest