Contact
Damages | Litigation

What to do about the bull on my bonnet?

Motorists on our South African roads are exposed on a daily basis to the very real risk of colliding with an animal. Road signs on our roads warn motorists against anything from penguins to hippos, cattle to porcupines, all which might be found crossing a road somewhere in the country.

Since this could happen to any of us, it’s good to know that there is in fact a legal duty on land owners towards road users to prevent livestock from straying on to the road, either by erecting and maintaining proper fencing and/or to keep any gates giving access to the road closed and locked.

But when a collision with an animal happens the owner of the damaged vehicle needs to do more than just prove that he/she collided with an animal belonging to someone else, or that the animal was the responsibility of another person to keep off the road. The owner of the damaged vehicle also needs to prove negligence on the part of the owner or person in control of the animal and who exercises control over the fence.

Simply put it’s not enough just to claim that the animal was in the road and therefore the owner of the animal was negligent. In addition, the owner of the damaged vehicle needs to prove negligence, such as the farmer leaving the gate open or failing to erect and maintain an adequate fence around the property on which the livestock is kept, that led to the animal being in the road.

So the next time a bull ends up on your bonnet, make sure that you gather as much possible evidence that can show negligence on the part of the owner of the animal, either by taking photographs of the open gate/broken fence etc. or getting the police to specifically note this in the accident report.

When the animal in question is a “wild” animal instead of livestock, and is kept by a game rancher with game fencing, the same test of negligence will apply. However, where wild animals are not fenced in, they have no owner and the owner of the damaged vehicle will have no one to claim from.

The following checklist can assist you in the unfortunate event of a collision with an animal:

  • If necessary, first get medical attention for yourself and your passengers.
  • Warn approaching traffic of the obstruction in the road.
  • Notify the SAPS and local authorities.
  • Make notes of any identifying features on the animal, such as ear-tags, branding etc. (to prove ownership of the animal).
  • Identify and photograph any broken/neglected fences or open gates, and point them out to the police officials at the scene and make sure that they are noted in the accident report.
  • Submit this information to your insurer and/or contact your attorney for legal advice as to claiming for damages suffered.
July 8, 2014
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest