The liability of company directors

“A friend of mine has a good business concept and he has asked me to come on board as a partner. He wants to set up a company and make both of us directors in the company. I want to be part of the business but I’m not sure about being a director and what my liability may be?”

A company is a reliable and well known vehicle to use for a business. That said, many company directors are not always aware of the nature and scope of their duties as directors and their liability should these duties not be complied with.

A director of a company is a member of the board of directors of the company. The board is responsible for the management of the affairs of a company and must exercise all of the powers and perform all of the functions of the company, in accordance with the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the “Companies Act”) and the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (“MOI”).

Directors must comply with the various duties they have in terms of the Companies Act, failure of which could expose them to potential liability. The approach adopted by the Companies Act is that directors who fail to comply with their duties should be held personally liable for losses incurred by the company. 

Directors are exposed to the following forms of potential liability:

Civil liability. A director who breaches his or her duties may be held jointly and severally (fully and equally) liable together with any other person for commiting certain acts.
Criminal liability. Section 214 of the Companies Act provides for criminal liability of those directors trading a company in a manner which is calculated to defraud a creditor.
Breach of fiduciary duties. In the event that a director breaches his fiduciary duties to the company, such director may be held personally liable for any loss, damages or costs sustained by the company as a result of such breach.
Breach of the duty of care, skill and diligence. Directors may be held liable in terms of civil action for any loss, damages or costs sustained by the company as a result of the breach of a director’s duty of care, skill and diligence.
Liability for breaching the Companies Act. The Companies Act stipulates that a director will be liable for any loss, damages or costs sustained by the Company as a direct or indirect consequence of the director having breached certain provisions of the Companies Act.
Liability towards the shareholders of the company. Directors of a company may potentially be held liable by the shareholders of the company for breach of their duties in certain circumstances.

Clearly, becoming a director is no casual decision. It should not mean that you should shy away from becoming a director, but rather that it should make you aware that a thorough understanding of the responsibility of being a director is vitally important, as a breach of your duties as director can hold serious consequences. If you are still unsure about your decision, contact your attorney to discuss your concerns and responsibilities towards the business should you wish to take on the role of director in the new business venture.

October 4, 2018
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest