Appeal Court settles debate on when you can claim arrear maintenance

A friend of yours has been divorced for a few years now. Her ex was supposed to pay maintenance, but it wasn’t long before he started paying less and less and then eventually stopped. Your friend was just too fearful of conflict to do anything about it and continued to raise her kids by herself. Now however, money is tight and she is wondering if there is anything she can do to get her ex to pay the maintenance he should have paid?

The above scenario is unfortunately quite common where exes don’t meet their responsibilities and pay maintenance. Yet, where does this leave the other spouse? Can they recover arrear maintenance or is there no remedy if the left this too long? Our Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has hopefully now finally established the position in law.

In an appeal from the Western Cape Division of the High Court our SCA had to consider the following situation. An ex-husband had to pay maintenance for two minor children as well as his ex-wife in terms of their divorce settlement, which was made an order of the court. The husband defaulted on the obligation to pay and the ex-wife later had a writ of execution issued in respect of the arrear maintenance. The ex-husband contended that the maintenance order was not judgement debt which prescribed after 30 years as per the Prescription Act, but was an ordinary debt which prescribes after three years in terms of the Prescription Act.

The Western Cape Division of the High Court held that the maintenance obligations in the settlement arose from a judgment debt as contemplated in the Prescription Act, and that the maintenance obligations incorporated in the order was subject to 30 years before prescribing.

Our SCA, in reviewing the decision and position in law, concurred with the decision of the High Court and upheld the finding that maintenance orders that were made an order of court only expired after 30 years. This means that a party can at any time before the expiry of the 30 years approach a court to claim arrear maintenance from a party not fulfilling his or her maintenance obligations.

The SCA decision is strong confirmation of the importance of parties having to honour their agreed maintenance obligations and that a party cannot hide behind the effluxion of time to excuse their failure to pay maintenance.

Should you or someone you know be in the position where an ex is not paying his/her maintenance get in touch with us or contact your attorney to assist you with taking action to recover any arrear maintenance.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 13, 2022
When “just a WhatsApp” becomes legal evidence

When “just a WhatsApp” becomes legal evidence

WhatsApp and similar messaging platforms have become a staple of modern communication and, increasingly, also business communication. But, viewing these platforms as informal and not binding could be dangerous, as the recent case of Gerritsen Trading CC t/a Gerritsen Drilling SA v Blydskap Holdings (Pty) Ltd (2024/146798) [2025] ZAWCHC 400 (27 August 2025) demonstrates.

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

A landmark judgment delivered on 3 October 2025 by the Constitutional Court of South Africa has reshaped the legal landscape governing employment and family rights. In Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour; Commission for Gender Equality and Another v Minister of Employment and Labour and Others (CCT 308/23) [2025] ZACC 20, the Court declared several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”) and the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 (“UIF Act”) invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution in that they unfairly discriminate between different classes of parents.

AI regulation on the horizon

AI regulation on the horizon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and everyday life. We now live in an era where information cannot be trusted at face value, and content creation blurs the lines between reality and fiction. With such a dangerous capability literally at anyone’s fingertips, it is normal to wonder whether AI is being regulated in South Africa. In this article, we look at the current position regarding AI in South Africa.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest