Further levelling of the playing field with the new Recognition of Customary Marriages Amendment Act

“My mother is a black woman who has been married since the early 1970’s to my father in accordance with customary law. They have never concluded a civil marriage, and my mother has also been our home provider while my father worked. Their marriage has become strained over the last couple of years, and I’m worried about my mother, should my father decide to divorce her. What are her marital rights?”

To answer your question, we must consider the recently enacted Recognition of Customary Marriages Amendment Act which came into force on 1 June 2021 (“Amendment Act”). The Amendment Act aims to amend the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998, by further regulating the proprietary consequences of a customary marriage entered into before 15 November 2000.

Section 7(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act previously determined that the proprietary consequences of a customary marriage entered into before the commencement of the Act, continues to be governed by customary law, essentially resulting in wives that had entered into a customary marriage before the commencement of the Act, not having any matrimonial property rights.

The constitutionality of this provision was reviewed by our Constitutional Court, which found the provision to be discriminatory against wives on the basis of gender, race and ethnicity and also perpetuated inequality between husbands and wives in polygamous marriages entered into before the commencement of the Act. The Constitutional Court called on Parliament to correct this unconstitutionality, resulting in the current Amendment Act being promulgated.

The Amendment Act therefore places men and women on equal footing when it comes to the proprietary consequences of customary marriages entered into even before the commencement of the Act in that women can now lay claim to the joint estate where they previously could not. Accordingly, should your mother and father consider a divorce your mother may in principle have a claim to the joint estate in accordance with the Amendment Act. 

July 14, 2021
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest