Contact
Addiction | Employment | Labour

How must you manage an addict in your employ?

“I recently confided to my line manager that I have an alcohol problem. Soon thereafter the company sent out an email informing us that anybody caught drinking or smelling of alcohol at work would be subject to disciplinary proceedings. I know I have a problem and need help, but I am worried that the employer is getting ready to dismiss me. Can they do this?”

There is a thin line between addiction and being under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Our labour laws recognise addiction as a form of incapacity and employers are required to actively assist employees with overcoming addiction through counselling and rehabilitation. 

It would however be incorrect to say that an employer can never take disciplinary steps against an employee who is under the influence of drugs or alcohol because each case is decided on its own merits and will determine whether counselling, rehabilitation or disciplinary action is the appropriate course of action. For instance, counselling or rehabilitation would not be appropriate for an employee who denies that she/he has an alcohol/substance dependency or refuses assistance in the form of counselling or rehabilitation. This means that such an employee may be subjected to disciplinary proceedings which could, depending on the facts, lead to sanctions such as dismissal.

Employees need not be under the influence during working hours in order to receive assistance in the form of counselling or rehabilitation and the obligation of assistance also includes employees who have displayed a habit of being unable to perform their duties during working hours as a result of their habitual alcohol consumption/substance use in their private time.

Although employers are required to deal with addiction cases in a sensitive manner by offering assistance to an affected employee, it is important to be mindful of the fact that employers are also required to provide a safe working environment for all employees. This means that an employee who is under the influence of alcohol or drugs not only poses a risk to themselves but to other employees as well. Employers should have a policy in place to address substance/alcohol abuse at the workplace or during the scope of one’s duties, the prohibition on such use, testing procedures and an employee assistance programme which outlines the counselling or rehabilitation option. 

I would therefore recommend that you consult your company’s policy on alcohol and substance abuse to familiarize yourself with the company procedures or where no such policy exists, take up your problem with your employer and request assistance to deal with your addiction.

February 10, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest