May I get time off from work to breastfeed?

“I recently gave birth to a baby boy. I want to breastfeed my son, but being back at work is making it very difficult for me to breastfeed as our breaks are quite short. May I ask my employer for more time during the day to breastfeed, or is that not allowed?”

Fortunately our Legislature has recognised the importance of providing for the accommodation of breastfeeding mothers and has promulgated a Code of Good Practice on the Protection of Employees during Pregnancy and after the Birth of a Child (“Code”). This Code provides guidelines for the protection of the health of women against potential hazards in their work environment during pregnancy, after the birth of a child and while breastfeeding and also makes it pertinent that discrimination against pregnant women is not allowed.

The Code provides guidelines to employers to accommodate breastfeeding employees and specifically provides that an employer must at a minimum accommodate breastfeeding employees by providing breaks of 30 minutes twice per day for breastfeeding or expressing milk, for the first six months of the child’s life. This will be in addition to for example the official lunchbreak of the employee.

It must however be understood, that the norms established by the Code are general and serve as guidelines for employers. These norms may not however be appropriate for all workplaces. A departure from the Code may therefore be justified in certain circumstances by an employer.

I would advise that you discuss your rights with your employer and refer your employer to a copy of the Code which can be downloaded from the Department of Labour’s website at www.labour.gov.za.

 
September 7, 2016
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest