Contact
Employment | Employment Equity Act

Unpacking the proposed new Employment Equity Bill

“My company is relatively small with only 12 employees. That said, I’ve had to comply with employment equity requirements as we qualify as a designated employer because of our company turnover. I’ve heard there are proposed changes afoot for the employment equity environment and was wondering what this may mean for my business.”

There is most certainly amendments afoot in respect of employment equity. In 2020 a new Employment Equity Bill was introduced and which Bill has now progressed further towards finalisation. The Bill proposes a number of changes to the current employment equity legislation. 

One such proposed amendment is a change to the definition of designated employer, which if passed will determine that a designated employer will now exclusively be an employer that has at least 50 employees or more and will no longer include an employer who is over a certain turnover threshold. The reason for this proposed amendment, according to the Bill, is to reduce the regulatory burden on small employers. 

The Bill also proposes that the Minister of Employment and Labour be empowered to identify national economic sectors and to set numerical targets for the employment of certain designated groups for these sectors. Companies who wish to do business with organs of state will have to obtain a compliance certificate which will require that they meet the numerical targets set for them or have a reasonable reason for not meeting the targets. A compliance certificate will not be issued if the employer has not submitted its most recent employment equity report, was found to have breached the prohibition on unfair discrimination in terms of the Act or failed to pay the minimum wage within the last 3 years.

A further amendment that can be highlighted is the definition of people with disabilities as proposed by the Bill. The Bill intends to align the definition with the current definition contained in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which is set to expand the current definition to include people who have a long-term or recurring physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which, in interaction with various barriers, may substantially limit their prospects of entry into, or advancement in, employment. Businesses will need to take note of this new definition.

The proposed changes will assist smaller businesses like yours that previously only qualified as designated employers because of their turnover and absolve them from having to comply with the numerical targets to be set by the Minister of Employment and Labour. Larger employers qualifying as designated employers will however have to comply.

The proposed changes are due to become effective in March 2022 and it is advised that all businesses contact their labour advisors to prepare for the coming into force of these amendments.

 
November 15, 2021
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest