Can my child become an Aussie without daddy’s consent?

“I am recently divorced. I want to permanently relocate to Australia with my two minor children as I have obtained a wonderful work opportunity which will benefit myself and my children tremendously. However, my ex, the father of my two children, refuses to give his consent, despite the fact that the children reside with me. Do I need his consent to take them with me?”

Where both parents have guardianship of the children, as is usually the norm, notwithstanding whom the children reside with, it necessarily follows that consent will be needed from the other parent when one parent decides to relocate to another country with a minor. However if one parent refuses to provide consent it does not mean that you will never be able to take your children with you should you wish to relocate to another country. Our courts have recently held that the mother with whom the children resided could relocate to another country with her minor children without the consent of their father, provided the consent of the court was obtained.

It is however important to note that it is not a given that a court will automatically provide consent where one parent refuses. The Children’s Act only states that the consent of the non-custodial parent is required for the departure or removal of a minor from South Africa.Therefore our courts have to consider various factors before they will grant an order allowing relocation.

The two most important factors the court will rely on is whether the decision of the parent to relocate is bona fide, reasonable and genuinely taken, and secondly, if it would be in the best interest of the child. Furthermore, the applicant will also have to show that the child’s well-being, care and education will be better provided for in another country. This means that the court will throughout the application evaluate, weigh and balance the competing factors from both parents’ sides and also take into account the child’s wishes in appropriate cases.

Examples of factors counting in favour of the parent relocating with the children:

1. Financial advantages that will better the children’s living conditions.
2. Safer living conditions for the children.
3. Better educational opportunities for the children.
4. Whether close family members in the children’s lives will relocate with them, for example grandmothers and/or grandfathers.
5. If there would be a stronger support system for the children, for example if other family members of the children already live in the country where they are relocating to.
6. Where the non-custodial parent is absent in the children’s lives.

Examples of factors counting against the parent relocating with the children:

1. If the children have a very strong relationship with the non-custodial parent.
2. If the non-custodial parent plays an important role in the children’s daily lives.
3. If the financial capacity of the parents would restrict the children to continue the relationship with the non-custodial parent.

The court, as the upper guardian of a child, takes upon itself a grave responsibility to decide whether to override the non-consenting parent and will only do so after the most careful consideration of all the circumstances. 

From the above it is clear that in determining whether you have the right to relocate with your children without the other parent’s consent is not a cut and dry decision. Each matter will differ according to the specific situation and our courts will always carefully assess the reasonableness of the custodial parent’s decision, with the children’s best interest being paramount. Our recommendation is to consult with a family law specialist to help you assess the merits of applying to court for an order allowing you to relocate your children to another country without your ex’s consent.

June 2, 2016
Tinsel, trolleys, and traps: Outsmarting the Black Friday storm

Tinsel, trolleys, and traps: Outsmarting the Black Friday storm

As Black Friday specials and festive-season sales saturate the market, retailers compete with promises of “unbeatable” discounts and “blink-and-you-miss-it” deals. But even in the frenzy, the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (the “CPA”) still applies. Designed to curb deceptive advertising, ensure fair pricing, and guarantee that goods remain of acceptable quality, the CPA sets the rules of the game. Understanding these rights is essential for both suppliers and shoppers, helping prevent year-end discounts from turning into disputes.

Unlocking the Path to Compliance: Navigating South Africa’s Mandatory EPC Requirements for Commercial Property Owners

Unlocking the Path to Compliance: Navigating South Africa’s Mandatory EPC Requirements for Commercial Property Owners

Attention to all owners of commercial property buildings: Are you aware of the imminent and significant change in South African property law that directly affects you? By December 2025, all non-residential buildings are required to possess Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) as mandated by recent regulations published on 8 December 2020 in the Government Gazette. Failure to comply could result in hefty fines up to R5 million or even imprisonment for five years. These regulations are poised to add further requirements to the conveyancing process and commercial property disposal landscape, introducing new responsibilities that you, as a commercial building owner, need to be aware of.

Can a Body Corporate Pull the Plug? Lessons from the Katisi Case

Can a Body Corporate Pull the Plug? Lessons from the Katisi Case

South Africa’s sectional title market remains a cornerstone of urban property investment, accounting for approximately 30% of all residential property transactions in 2024. Despite its growth and resilience amid economic pressure, the sector presents unique legal and procedural complexities – particularly for Conveyancers.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest