My mother’s sick. Can I manage her personal affairs?

My mother has been living with Alzheimer’s for a number of years. She has always been very independent and insisted on managing her own affairs even after my father passed away. Unfortunately of late, she has deteriorated very badly, to the point where I am very concerned about her financial situation and her care. I know my father left her some money, and I want to make sure that this money is correctly used for her care. But am I allowed to take over control of her affairs?

Our law does allow for a person to take over control of the personal affairs of another. Of course this is not a quick process, as the law must make sure that a person’s independence and responsibility for their financial position and health is not willy-nilly passed to another. Where a person no longer has the mental capacity to manage their own affairs as a result of an illness such as Alzheimer’s, our courts can be approached for assistance to transfer the management of the person’s affairs to another.

High Court Rule 57 governs the procedure for a court application to appoint a curator for the person or property of someone who is of unsound mind and/or unable to manage his/her own affairs (“the patient”). The application can be made by any person who has a direct interest in the matter and must be supported by an affidavit with all the required information. The affidavit will usually be supported by three further affidavits: an affidavit by someone who knows the patient and is familiar with the patient’s mental state and two further affidavits by a medical practitioner and a psychiatrist, reporting on the medical condition of the patient and their opinion of whether the patient is incapable of managing his/her own affairs.

The court will be asked to firstly appoint a curator ad litem (usually an advocate or attorney) whose duty it is to manage the patient’s interests in court. The curator ad litem must interview the patient and consult with the proposed curator and draft a report, which together with a report by the Master of the High Court, will assist the court with the decision of whether to appoint a curator bonis (person who  manages the patient’s estate) and/or a curator personae (person who is responsible for and takes decisions in respect of the physical person of the patient, e.g. hospitalisation, medical care etc). 

This appointed curator may be a family member or a court appointed curator. When a family member brings such an application to court, it does not automatically mean that the family member will be appointed as the curator of the patient’s estate or person. The family member will have to furnish reasons to the court as to why they are a suitable candidate to take over the affairs of the patient and/or make decisions regarding their person.

Where a curator has been appointed over the affairs of a patient, such a patient is deemed unable to undertake any legal transactions and can only create legally binding transactions or take decisions through the court appointed curator. Where a mental illness is of a temporary nature, the patient can make an application to court requesting the termination of the curatorship by providing reasons as to why the court should terminate the curatorship and allow the patient to assume responsibility for his or her own affairs.

In your situation, you would be able to approach a court to request that you be appointed as the curator both of your mother’s estate as well as her person, in order to take decisions regarding her future medical treatment and care. As this is a complex process and will require appropriate medical reports to be obtained, it is important that you approach your lawyer for assistance with this process.

July 15, 2015
Tinsel, trolleys, and traps: Outsmarting the Black Friday storm

Tinsel, trolleys, and traps: Outsmarting the Black Friday storm

As Black Friday specials and festive-season sales saturate the market, retailers compete with promises of “unbeatable” discounts and “blink-and-you-miss-it” deals. But even in the frenzy, the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (the “CPA”) still applies. Designed to curb deceptive advertising, ensure fair pricing, and guarantee that goods remain of acceptable quality, the CPA sets the rules of the game. Understanding these rights is essential for both suppliers and shoppers, helping prevent year-end discounts from turning into disputes.

Unlocking the Path to Compliance: Navigating South Africa’s Mandatory EPC Requirements for Commercial Property Owners

Unlocking the Path to Compliance: Navigating South Africa’s Mandatory EPC Requirements for Commercial Property Owners

Attention to all owners of commercial property buildings: Are you aware of the imminent and significant change in South African property law that directly affects you? By December 2025, all non-residential buildings are required to possess Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) as mandated by recent regulations published on 8 December 2020 in the Government Gazette. Failure to comply could result in hefty fines up to R5 million or even imprisonment for five years. These regulations are poised to add further requirements to the conveyancing process and commercial property disposal landscape, introducing new responsibilities that you, as a commercial building owner, need to be aware of.

Can a Body Corporate Pull the Plug? Lessons from the Katisi Case

Can a Body Corporate Pull the Plug? Lessons from the Katisi Case

South Africa’s sectional title market remains a cornerstone of urban property investment, accounting for approximately 30% of all residential property transactions in 2024. Despite its growth and resilience amid economic pressure, the sector presents unique legal and procedural complexities – particularly for Conveyancers.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest