Is sequestration the end of the road, or is there relief?

“I recently read about a well known sportsman being sequestrated. Does it necessarily mean it’s the end for him, or will his debt simply be written off so he can start over?”

The position regarding sequestration is often unclear to Joe Public, and the perception can easily arise that it’s an easy way to escape your responsibilities.  

Firstly, it is important to understand that sequestration can only take place by way of a court order. A person cannot declare themselves bankrupt in order to bypass their responsibilities. A sequestration order can be granted on either the debtor’s request – known as voluntary surrender of your estate – or through one of a person’s creditors – known as compulsory sequestration. 

The test a court applies to determine if someone’s estate is insolvent, is to ascertain whether a person’s reasonably calculated liabilities exceeds his reasonably appraised assets, which then means the person is “factually insolvent.” A sequestration order can also be granted when a person’s assets exceed his liabilities, but where a person cannot settle his debts due to for example a problem with cash flow, such a person will be regarded as “commercially insolvent.” But the fact that a person cannot pay his debts or accounts, is just one of the indicators that a person is possibly insolvent. A sequestration order will only be granted when the court is convinced that it will benefit the concurrent creditors, and therefore sequestration is a process for the benefit of creditors, and not necessarily the insolvent. 

The purpose of a sequestration order is to liquidate an insolvent’s assets and to, according to the ranking of creditors, divide the revenue from the sale of assets pro rata among the creditors, as determined by the Insolvency Act.

As soon as a provisional sequestration order is granted, a curator takes charge of the insolvent’s estate and affairs, and may the insolvent no longer take on any further responsibilities or debts upon himself, or deal with his estate assets. The insolvent may then also not do certain things himself (or only to a limited extent), may only conclude certain contracts and may not hold certain positions. For dealings he may not conduct himself, the insolvent will require his curator’s written consent, and will not be able to act without such consent. The curator will only only consider providing consent if it does not disadvantage the creditors of the estate. 

Insolvency is not permanent. An insolvent can be rehabilitated and then act and transact as before. An insolvent is automatically rehabilitated after 10 years, calculated from the date on which the provisional order has been granted. In addition there are different circumstances and periods within which the insolvent can approach the court for rehabilitation. In the case of the insolvent bringing an application to court, the court has to be convinced that the person is indeed rehabilitated, and can the curator or a creditor object against the granting of a rehabilitation order, which will be taken into consideration by the court. 

The benefit of sequestration, though not the primary purpose thereof, is that once the insolvent has been successfully rehabilitated, he is free from all debt that existed prior to his sequestration order (with some exceptions). This means that, even though a person will no longer have his previous assets, he can start again from scratch. A sequestration order is therefore not the end of the world, but it is certainly not a pleasant experience, and can for as much as 10 years have a dramatic effect on a person’s life.

September 12, 2016
Alleenmandaat: Moet ek of moet ek nie?

Alleenmandaat: Moet ek of moet ek nie?

Menigte voornemende verkopers word gekonfronteer met ‘n uitnodiging van eiendomsagente om aan hulle ‘n alleenmandaat vir die verkoop van hul eiendom toe te staan. 9 uit 10 kere is die onmiddellike reaksie om die aanbod van die hand te wys as gevolg van die opvatting dat ‘n alleenmandaat bloot ‘n slim manier deur ‘n eiendomsagent is om eksklusiewe regte tot jou eiendom te bekom wat moontlik tot gevolg sal hê dat jou eiendom nie effektief aan die mark blootgestel word nie en die kanse om jou eiendom te verkoop, verminder.

Sole Mandate: Should I or Shouldn’t I?

Sole Mandate: Should I or Shouldn’t I?

Many prospective sellers are confronted with an invitation by estate agents to grant them a sole mandate for the sale of their property. 9 out of 10 times the immediate reaction is to decline the offer due to a perception that a sole mandate is only a clever way for the estate agent to obtain exclusive rights to your property which in turn will result in your property not being effectively introduced to the market and decreasing your chances of a successful sale.

Can I amend my Trust Deed?

Can I amend my Trust Deed?

A trust is an agreement between the founder of the trust and the trustees of the trust for the benefit of a third party, namely the trust beneficiaries of the trust. Different to a company, a trust is not established in terms of legislation, but is established by the trustdeed of the trust which serves as its founding document.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest