Contact
Insurance

Does my insurance cover damages due to public unrest and strikes?

“With all the civil unrest caused by striking workers, political rallies and student actions such as #feesmustfall, I was wondering whether insurance companies are required to pay out insured persons or companies whose property is damaged by these incidents?”

Most insurance policies have a clause that excludes the liability of the insurance company when property is damaged due to civil unrest, war or terrorism. A typical exemption clause in you insurance contract would read 

“This policy does not cover loss of or damage to property related to or caused by civil commotion, labour disturbances, riot, strike, lockout or public disorder or any act or activity which is calculated or directed to bring about any of the aforegoing.”

Given that your insurance policy probably excludes liability for this particular risk, it is important to add SASRIA cover to your short-term insurance policy to cover the eventuality of this risk. SASRIA stands for South African Special Risks Insurance Association and is a state-owned short-term insurance company, established in the late 1970’s following the increase of political unrest in South Africa after the 1976 uprisings. SASRIA provides cover for special risks other insurance companies do not cover like riots, strikes, terrorism, civil commotion and public disorder to corporate, commercial and individual policyholders. SASRIA is the only insurer in South Africa that provides cover for damage caused during these kinds of incidents.

SASRIA cover includes amongst others:

   
 • Additional cover for business interruption; 
 • Cover for damage to vehicles;
 • Insurance cover against material damage, which includes anything that isn’t covered by other categories.
   

SASRIA does not however do business directly with the public, and provides added cover to an existing short-term insurance policy. However, most insurance companies add SASRIA cover to their policies for a very low additional fee. 

In order to claim the damages through SASRIA, the incident that caused the damage must be reported to the police and the incident must have occurred in South Africa. For any policy holder to claim for damage under their SASRIA cover, they will have to claim in the same way as with any other claim from their own insurer. Their insurer will in turn liaise directly with SASRIA on their behalf to ensure that the claim, if valid, is paid out.

Although most policies include SASRIA cover, it would be advisable for any short-term insurance policyholder to check their policy conditions or inquire from their insurance broker whether they have SASRIA cover.

August 9, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest