Shining success in pivotal IT sector merger

In a landmark transaction that promises to redefine the landscape of South Africa’s information technology and telecommunications sector, the M&A Team of PH Attorneys played a crucial role in facilitating the acquisition of a leading cyber security software firm by a multinational enterprise software procurement company. This deal not only marks a significant milestone for both firms involved but also holds implications for the broader African market.

The excitement sparked by QBS Technology Group’s acquisition of Maxtec Peripherals has been the topic of considerable media attention and discussion throughout the cybersecurity distribution industry. This strategic move aligns with QBS Technology Group’s expansion strategy within the META (Middle East, Turkey, and Africa) region, signalling their commitment to bolstering global presence and tapping into emerging markets with promising potential.

The M&A Team of PH Attorneys, led by Johnny DavisLuhann Prinsloo and Dr Candice Reynders helped navigate the complexities of the deal. The team, given their extensive M&A, competition, tax and regulatory expertise, assisted with strategic guidance and managed deal regulatory compliance as well as comprehensive transaction due diligence. The team also played a strong transaction advisory role throughout, ensuring that cradle to grave, all the i’s were dotted and t’s crossed.

Steven Turner, Chief Legal Officer from QBS Technology Group, expressed their satisfaction with the outcome, stating, “We were really pleased with the dedication, tenacity, and know-how demonstrated by the team at PH during our recent competition instruction. The matter was highly complex, difficult to execute, and full of hurdles, but the team at PH approached it in a pragmatic manner with good humour and timely commercial advice where required.”


Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

May 8, 2024
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest