Important increases to the national minimum wage

The media has been reporting on a new minimum earnings threshold for employees. This article briefly summarises the new earnings threshold's main impact on employees and employers.

The Minister of Employment and Labour promulgated two significant changes to the earnings of employees that took effect from 1 March 2023 through the increase of the national minimum wage by 9,62% and the increase to the earnings threshold from R224 080.48 to R241 110.59 per annum.

About the latter issue, an increase to the earnings threshold means that all employees earning R241 110.59 per annum, or approximately R20 092.55 per month and above, will be excluded from the application and/or automatic protection of several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”). Employees earning above this threshold are not automatically entitled to payment for overtime or weekends off as prescribed by the BCEA. Moreover, the earnings threshold also has an impact on the application of various provisions in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2018 and the CCMA Rules.

With the increase of the national minimum wage to R25.42 per hour for all domestic and farm workers, employers will now be required to pay domestic workers and/or farmworkers just over R4 000.00 if they tender their service for 5 days per week and work for 8 hours per day for 20 days a month. The increase in the national minimum wage shall not apply to employees employed on an expanded public works programme and workers who have concluded learnership agreements in terms of section 17 of the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998.

A failure to pay employees in accordance with the rates prescribed by the National Minimum Wage Act may result in a dispute for monies owing and/or a compliance order which may be issued in terms of the provisions of the BCEA. These disputes or claims may be referred to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration for conciliation and arbitration.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

April 24, 2023
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest