Contact
Heritage and law | Heritage Day | Heritage Day South Africa | New Breed | New Breed Law Firm

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

On 24 September, we pause to take time off to commemorate Heritage Day, a day enshrined in both our public calendar and the Constitution. A constitutional affirmation of who we are, where we come from, and where we are headed as a nation. As a new breed law firm, we reflect on how the practice of law is intertwined with the heritage of the very people it serves.

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa stands as a living testament of the diversity of our heritage. Section 31 explicitly recognises cultural, religious, and linguistic communities. The Preamble further reminds us of the imperative to heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice, and fundamental human rights. This underscores the importance of law firms carrying the social responsibility not only to provide legal services, but to also safeguard and promote the dignity of cultural diversity.  

A law firm is not simply a place for drafting contracts and exchanging pleadings, it is a space where multiple heritages meet. From a Sesotho speaking client to the Afrikaans trained conveyancer, and your English drafting counsel. Heritage Day allows legal professionals to see beyond the letters on legislations and to appreciate the traditions of the people who look to law for justice.

It is worth noting that disputes and negotiations often arise in contexts deeply rooted in heritage. New breed law firms are thus increasingly required to interpret the law in accordance with their clients’ lived experiences. For example, legal frameworks now extend protection to amongst others, customary succession, intellectual property and traditional knowledge. Heritage Day thus reminds legal practitioners that every brief carried is not only a legal issue, but it is also a human story shaped by culture.

Commemorating Heritage Day in our own law practices is indicative that diversity is not merely tolerated, it is promoted and cherished. Cultural practices embody ubuntu, and as a new breed law firm we should not only value intelligence and efficiency but also empathy. After all, law is a human profession supported by people who bring their cultural legacy to every court appearance, consultation, and to every piece drafted.

Heritage Day is therefore more than just a public holiday. It is an opportunity for the legal profession to reaffirm its role in building our nation, by respecting, protecting, and cherishing the heritage of all South Africans. 

Whilst strongly united in our diversity, we celebrate what makes us different and unique because that is where our strength lies.
Let us celebrate this day with our colourful and richly diverse cultures. “! KE E: /XARRA //KE” (DIVERSE PEOPLE UNITE | DIVERSE MENSE VERENIG)

September 22, 2025
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest