How far is a bank liable if you lose your credit card and pin?

“I lost my wallet with my credit card in it and a piece of paper on which I wrote down my new card pin number. Because I was hoping I may still find my wallet, I didn’t immediately stop my bank card. A few hours later somebody used my card to pay for food on the other side of town. I then immediately phoned the bank to stop the card and informed the bank that somebody else had my card and pin. The bank told me in that case the bank would not be liable for my losses. Is this true?”

Generally, when unauthorised transactions have taken place on a bank card, the bank will investigate to ascertain how the transaction had occurred and who was liable for losses incurred. In general most card agreements entered into between a bank and cardholder includes provisions that the cardholder has a contractual obligation to keep the card safe and not disclose the card pin to anyone. The bank also has a contractual obligation to mitigate losses in a case where the cardholder informs them of a fraudulent transaction.

Our courts have found that a cardholder can be liable for losses if the cardholder acts negligently by for example, disclosing the pin. This was determined after taking into account the provisions of the Code of Banking Practice in South Africa read together with the contract concluded between the bank and the cardholder. Exceptions may be where card thieves have obtained the pin by recording the cardholder when using the pin etc. and the Ombudsman for Banking Services indicated in a Card Cloning Bulletin that it cannot reasonably be expected that a cardholder must search for things like hidden cameras. 

Where a card pin was obtained for example by the cardholder storing the pin in a wallet with his card and the card and pin were used to conclude transactions, it will probably stand to good reason that the cardholder was negligent in this respect and the bank would not be liable for the unauthorised transactions, taking into account the contractual terms between the bank and the cardholder. 

Banks do however generally have an obligation to mitigate losses, subject to the circumstances of each case, and if a cardholder for instance informed the bank that the card and pin has been compromised or stolen and the bank fails to stop the card, then the bank could be held liable for losses ensuing.

Each case will however have to be assessed on its merits and the refusal of a bank to accept liability for losses can be challenged by a court or possibly the Ombudsman for Banking Services. In your case the circumstances appear to point towards negligence on your side which will preclude the bank from being liable for the unauthorised transaction on your card.

June 11, 2020
See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

See no evil, speak no evil: reporting misconduct

Enforcing workplace rules frequently relies on employees reporting misconduct that they have witnessed by fellow employees to their employer. This is vital for maintaining workplace discipline and ensuring that employees adhere to the employer’s rules. But what is the worst that can happen to an employee who elects to protect a fellow employee by keeping quiet about their transgressions?

Cast your nets and navigate the waters of phishing and whaling

Cast your nets and navigate the waters of phishing and whaling

With the digital world evolving at unimaginable speeds, cybercriminals are cashing in as they attack individuals and businesses without constraint from virtually anywhere. South Africa and the African continent are coming under heavy fire from cyber criminals as growing economies expand their internet accessibility and so open new and vulnerable targets for cyber-attacks. In this article, we look at a form of cyber-attack called “phishing” with its variants and what you should look out for.

Who pays for construction delays?

Who pays for construction delays?

There is an old joke in the construction sector that says, “All construction projects follow the 3, 2, 1 rule – It takes three times longer than planned, costs twice as much as planned, and you only ever develop property once.” This is obviously an exaggeration, but as is often the case, there is some truth in the joke. In this article, we explore construction projects that are not completed by their deadlines, examining who should be held accountable for this and the additional costs that usually follow.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest