
Back left to right: Charl Mocke (CMV), Kevin Kitchenbrand (UOAS), Johan Liebenberg (VDT), Arnold Prinsloo (ESKORT),
Front left to right: Adrie van Staden (Beeld-kinderfonds), Abie Maphala (ABSA), Piet Joubert (AIDA), Steinman de Bruyn (VDT).
Back left to right: Charl Mocke (CMV), Kevin Kitchenbrand (UOAS), Johan Liebenberg (VDT), Arnold Prinsloo (ESKORT),
Front left to right: Adrie van Staden (Beeld-kinderfonds), Abie Maphala (ABSA), Piet Joubert (AIDA), Steinman de Bruyn (VDT).
With amendments to the provisions of Section 17(2)(f) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 which became effective in 2024, it begs the question whether an application for reconsideration in terms of Section 17(2)(f) is still available to litigants.
The recent case of MM v Kiewiet (A193/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 411 (3 May 2024) sheds some light on the appropriate forums for addressing different types of disputes when it comes to community schemes.
New draft Regulations to the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA)” have been circulated for comment and relate to the processing of health and sex life data. Given the sensitive nature of such information, the fear of many data subjects has circled the unconsented sharing or processing of the data as it pertains to health and sex life. In this article, we take a brief look at the proposed new regulations.