Buying property as cohabiting partners

Buying or selling property is a significant step in any individual's life, but when it comes to cohabiting partners, the process can be even more complex. Cohabitation, where an unmarried couple lives together, brings its own unique set of considerations when it comes to property transactions. In this article, we will discuss the essential aspects that cohabiting partners should consider when buying or selling property together.

The foundation of any successful property transaction for cohabiting partners is open and honest communication. It is crucial to have transparent discussions about financial goals, preferences, and long-term plans. Communicate your expectations, financial contributions, and how you envision the property’s ownership structure. This ensures both partners are on the same page and can make informed decisions throughout the process.

Next, cohabiting partners should consider drafting a cohabitation agreement before embarking on a property transaction. This legally binding document outlines the rights and responsibilities of each partner and covers property ownership, contributions, division of assets, and potential scenarios such as separation or death. Understanding the implications of each option is imperative, as it can impact inheritance, taxation, and property division in the case of a separation.

When applying for a mortgage bond to purchase property, both partners’ incomes, credit scores, and financial histories may be evaluated. Your combined financial situation can determine the most suitable approach to buy the property. Deciding whether one partner or both will be indebted by the mortgage bond and clearly defining how financial contributions will be divided between partners becomes imperative. This will require determining the monthly mortgage bond payments as well as the maintenance costs of the property and potential rates and levies. It is essential to keep track of each partner’s contributions to avoid future disputes and to ensure a fair distribution of expenses.

Lastly, it is important to discuss an exit strategy in case the relationship ends or circumstances change. Address how the property will be handled, whether one partner will buy out the other’s share, or if the property will be sold and proceeds divided. This can be inserted into your cohabitation agreement and help avoid disputes in the future.

Buying or selling property as cohabiting partners requires careful consideration and the addressing of the legal considerations relating to such purchase or sale. This makes it imperative that cohabitating partners discuss their legal position and approach to purchase and exit beforehand and capture such in a cohabitation agreement drafted by their attorney. 

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

July 26, 2023
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest