What to do if the suspensive condition is not going to be met?

A typical situation encountered in a property transaction: The deed of sale has been signed, the intended buyer is applying for a loan but paperwork and delays at the bank slow things down. Suddenly the transferring attorney lets the buyer know that they only have a few days left to satisfy the suspensive condition in the deed of sale. What does all of this mean and what happens if the loan is given, but it’s a day late?

A suspensive condition is a condition which suspends the coming into effect of a property sale agreement until a certain future event occurs, which event is usually tied to a specific timeframe. For example, the buyer’s loan at a financial institution must be approved before a certain date, or, the buyer must successfully sell his existing property before a certain date. When such a suspensive condition in a deed of sale is met the agreement becomes unconditional and binding and the process of transferring the property to the buyer can officially start. If the condition or conditions are not met, the entire agreement will be null and void from the start of the agreement.

So, what does this mean?

It means that the agreement is void from the start as if it never existed, which is very different to a valid agreement that has been cancelled after the fact. Where the agreement is void, the seller cannot institute a claim against the buyer for specific performance or damages as could be done should there have been a valid agreement.

But, can the buyer and seller after the deadlines agree to continue with the agreement despite the conditions not having been met, because the buyer has convinced the seller for example that the loan will come through the next day?

In the recent case Codevilla v Kennedy-Smith NO and Others the court held that the general consequence of a failure to meet the suspensive condition in an agreement is that the contract has no legal force. The applicable principles are that a suspensive condition cannot be waived or extended after the time for fulfilment of the condition has passed. An agreement that has lapsed due to non-fulfillment of a suspensive condition or in the absence of a resolutive condition cannot be revived and it is necessary for the parties to enter into a new agreement.

What this means in practice is that once the sale agreement has lapsed there is no turning back the clock and the parties cannot after the fact revive the agreement because the loan has come through or the house was sold the next day. The only way for the parties to fix it is by entering into a new agreement.

That said, before a suspensive condition expires there is still opportunity for the parties to agree to extend or even waive the suspensive condition. If allowed by the main agreement, the parties can enter into an addendum to the main agreement wherein they extend the deadline or agree to waive the suspensive condition. But, this addendum must be correctly entered into by the parties before the deadline for the suspensive conditions, as once the deadline rolls by and this was not done, the agreement has lapsed and a whole new agreement must be entered into.

If you find yourself in the middle of selling or buying property, take note of any suspensive conditions in your agreement of sale and make sure you consult your property specialist timeously to help you add an addendum to the agreement if it looks like the conditions will not be met.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

July 15, 2022
Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

A landmark judgment delivered on 3 October 2025 by the Constitutional Court of South Africa has reshaped the legal landscape governing employment and family rights. In Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour; Commission for Gender Equality and Another v Minister of Employment and Labour and Others (CCT 308/23) [2025] ZACC 20, the Court declared several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”) and the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 (“UIF Act”) invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution in that they unfairly discriminate between different classes of parents.

AI regulation on the horizon

AI regulation on the horizon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and everyday life. We now live in an era where information cannot be trusted at face value, and content creation blurs the lines between reality and fiction. With such a dangerous capability literally at anyone’s fingertips, it is normal to wonder whether AI is being regulated in South Africa. In this article, we look at the current position regarding AI in South Africa.

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

Dividends from South African resident companies fall under the dividends tax regime and are subject to a 20% withholding tax in terms of section 64E of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“Act”), known as dividends tax, rather than normal income tax. In contrast, foreign dividends are included in a taxpayer’s gross income unless relief is available under section 10B of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, which provides a full or partial participation exemption depending on certain circumstances. In this article, we unpack the important distinction in the tax treatment of local vs foreign dividends in South Africa.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest