Application of the National Credit Act to property instalment sale agreements

“A buyer is interested in buying my flat. Her bank is not prepared to give her a loan because she is paying off a few personal loans, but she is prepared to enter into an instalment sale agreement to pay the purchase price in instalments over a period of time, much like a rental. I like the idea of at least getting a monthly income, but I am worried whether I can do this and charge interest on the instalments, particularly as it will take a few years for her to pay the price in full?”

The two primary pieces of legislation that should be considered in your situation are:

1. The Alienation of Land Act
2. The National Credit Act

The Alienation of Land Act regulates the requirements for the sale of immovable property where the purchaser agrees to pay the purchase price to the seller in more than two instalments over a period exceeding one year. 

The National Credit Act regulates credit agreements, i.e agreements that provides for: 

A deferral of payment;  and
A charge, levy or interest that is payable as a result of the deferral of payment. 

If an agreement therefore only provides for the deferment of the payment of capital, and no interest, fees or other charges are levied in respect thereof, then the National Credit Act does not apply to the sale agreement. Inflation of the purchase price over and above the market value of the property can be viewed as a charge or a fee which may make the National Credit Act applicable.

In your situation, should you therefore not charge any interest, charges or fees on the purchase price or you don’t inflate the purchase price above the market value the National Credit Act will not apply. 

However, should you wish to add interest, charges or fees on the purchase price or inflate the purchase price above the market value the National Credit Act will apply. The National Credit Act provides various forms of protection for consumers. In the context of an instalment sale agreement, the following then becomes relevant:

The seller will have to investigate the purchaser’s ability to service the ‘debt’ ie. the instalments, or run the risk of it being regarded as reckless lending should the purchaser not be able to repay the debt.
Also, even if the ‘credit’ was not recklessly provided, the purchaser may be able to access the remedies available to over-indebted persons under the National Credit Act, such as debt review where she cannot maintain the instalment payments.

As a seller contemplating an instalment sale agreement containing interest charges, it is important that you take careful note of the steps you have to take before concluding an instalment sale agreement and accordingly conduct the necessary investigations into the buyer’s ability to repay the debt.

November 9, 2016
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest