Contact
Business | Commercial | Company | Lease | Property

Can I force my tenant to trade?

“I own a small shopping complex. A key tenant, who must give six months’ notice if they don’t renew their lease, has just given notice. I don’t have a problem with that, but with months to go before they exit they have now stopped trading. This will have a big impact on feet to the complex if they don’t trade and I’ve asked them to continue trading until they vacate the premises, but the client refuses and says he’s cutting his losses. Can I force him to trade for the remainder of the lease agreement?”

Whether you can force the tenant to continue trading all depends on the terms of your lease agreement. 

In the case of Edcon Limited v Bay West City (Pty) Ltd, a landlord sought to force the lessee to continue trading after the latter gave notice that it would close its shop due to financial reasons. The lessee did however, continue to pay rent and maintain the premises. The landlord argued that, in order to attract customers and remain competitive in the market, tenants could not be allowed to simply close their doors whilst paying rent and are thus required to trade. The court however disagreed and held that, as long as the tenant honoured the lease, the landlord could not insist that the tenant continue trading where a term in the lease requiring the lessee to do so, did not exist. It further held that, should the lessee be obliged to carry on business for the full duration of the lease, even when suffering a loss, such onerous terms must be stipulated in the lease either expressly or by implication. 

Accordingly, unless there is a clear provision in your lease agreement that obliges the tenant to keep trading at full capacity for the remainder of the lease, you will not be able to force your tenant to continue trading. However, should there be such a provision you may be able to force your tenant to honour the agreement and continue trading.

It is accordingly advisable that you consult with your attorney regarding the lease agreement and to what extent it provides for the obligation to trade or continue trading during the period of notice. It may also be worthwhile to review all your other lease agreements to determine if the aspect of trading is adequately dealt with in your leases.

March 11, 2019
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest