Can my insolvency lead to termination of my lease?

“I own a few commercial properties that I rent out to businesses. Recently it has come to my attention that one of my longstanding tenants is going under financially. He has nearly two years left on his term. Can I terminate his rental agreement if he becomes insolvent?”

Generally rental agreements will contain a clause that stipulates that the lease agreement will terminate upon the insolvency of the tenant. However, such provisions may not provide the necessary protection if the provisions of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 are not properly considered. Section 37 of the Act determines that the liquidation or sequestration of a tenant cannot automatically lead to the termination of a lease agreement. 

It also determines that instead of an automatic cancellation of the lease, the trustee of the insolvent estate (who will be appointed by the Master of the High Court) has the authority to decide, by way of written notice, to either terminate or to continue with the lease. The trustee must do so within three months of being appointed. This means that a landlord may have to wait up to three months before a decision is made by the trustees to continue or terminate the lease. 

If however a rental agreement has specific breach provisions, it may be worthwhile to consider whether the tenant is not in breach and if the rental agreement could be terminated on such grounds before the tenant is declared insolvent. 

However, if this option is not available and the tenant is declared insolvent, the landlord will have no choice but to make contact with the trustee of the insolvent estate and enquire as to whether the lease will continue or not. Fortunately, all rent due under the current lease will be paid as costs of administration and accordingly the landlord will be paid before the secured or preferent creditors of the insolvent estate.

In your situation, it would therefore be prudent to ask your attorney to review the current rental agreement and assist you to navigate the situation correctly with your ‘in trouble’ tenant.

April 11, 2019
Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Protecting creators in the digital era – Copyright amendments

Nearly 5 decades after its original enactment, South Africa’s copyright regime is undergoing one of the most significant reforms in its history. The Copyright Amendment Bill [B13F-2017] introduces modern protections to secure the financial and digital interests of authors and performers, thereby strengthening their economic rights in an increasingly digital world. While parts of the Bill remain under constitutional review, a landmark 2025 court ruling has already enforced critical protections for users with disabilities. This article breaks down the primary measures intended to safeguard South African creativity.

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The importance of due diligence in M&A

The excitement of a merger or acquisition often sits in the “big picture” strategy, but the success of the deal lives or dies in the details. Due diligence is not a box-ticking exercise. It is the point at which assumptions are tested, risks are priced, and uncomfortable questions are asked. This article explores why looking before you leap, by conducting a thorough due diligence, is the golden rule of mergers & acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions.

Customary marriages stand equal

Customary marriages stand equal

In a landmark judgment delivered on 21 January 2026, the Constitutional Court pronounced welcomed clarity on the interplay between customary marriages, civil marriages, and antenuptial contracts (“ANC”). The Court, by majority decision in VVC v JRM and Others (CCT202/24) [2026] ZACC 2 (21 January 2026) , declined to confirm a High Court order that had declared section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) unconstitutional. The majority decision powerfully reaffirmed the equal constitutional status of customary marriages and established that spouses cannot unilaterally alter their matrimonial property regime without judicial oversight.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest