The previous owner did not pay. Can the municipality now cut off your electricity?

The municipality has notified me that it will disconnect my electricity supply because there are outstanding payments in respect of my property. However these outstanding amounts are not mine but belong to the previous owners from whom I bought the property last year. These accounts are nearly five years old! Can the municipality do this and cut off my electricity?

In the recent judgment of Stand 278 Strydom Park (Pty) Ltd v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality the applicant sought to obtain an interdict against the municipality preventing it from terminating the supply of municipal services to the property. The municipality wanted to terminate the services to the property because of ‘historical debt’ relating to the property ie. municipal debt in relation to property rates, taxes and charges for the provision of municipal services pertaining to all prior owners of the property. 

In this case the court confirmed that a current owner (“current owner”) of property is not liable for arrear debt or charges on accounts held by previous owners of the property (“prior owners”) and a municipality is not entitled to terminate the supply of services to the current owner on the grounds that the prior owners of the property are indebted to the municipality. 

The court however also confirmed the law as it currently stands – that a property can provide security for a municipal debt and that it may happen that a new owner’s property is declared executable for the municipal debt of a previous owner and that the municipality can sell a property in execution to recover such arrear debt. However the municipality must follow the following procedure:

In the event that there is historical debt relating to the property, the municipality must first obtain a judgment against the party legally responsible for such debt i.e. the relevant prior owner. 
Only once such a judgment has been obtained and the prior owner fails to settle the historical debt as required by the judgment order, can the municipality proceed to obtain an order to declare the security in relation to that historical debt to be executable – the security being the property of the current owner. 
To obtain such an order against the property, the municipality must join all parties having an interest in the matter, such as the current owner and bond holders (with registered bonds over the property) in order to allow each party to state their interest and defend the granting of an order to execute against the property.
The court will then have to decide whether the property of the current owner may be declared executable to recover the amount of the outstanding judgment owed by the prior owner.

Municipalities may accordingly not disconnect or threaten to disconnect any services or declare a property executable to recover historical debt against the property without obtaining a court order. If any such action is threatened it is advisable that you immediately consult with an attorney to assist you with defending your rights.

July 16, 2015
Preference shares may face new tax rules in 2026

Preference shares may face new tax rules in 2026

The use of preference shares in financing or corporate structuring has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Preference shares, being equity in nature, when used as a financing instrument, can take the form of a debt instrument, blurring the boundary between debt and equity. Accordingly, the South African government has proposed significant amendments to Section 8E of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“ITA”) in the form of the 2025 Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (“Bill”) published for public comment on 16 August 2025. The proposed amendments aim to align the tax treatment of “hybrid equity instruments” such as preference shares with their true economic substance. As it stands, these changes will come into effect on 1 January 2026.

Lights, camera, objection? The legal test of video evidence in court

Lights, camera, objection? The legal test of video evidence in court

The recent scandal involving suspended Independent Development Trust (IDT) CEO Tebogo Malaka has gripped South Africa’s legal and political landscape. A video allegedly showing Malaka and IDT spokesperson Phasha Makgolane attempting to bribe investigative journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh with R 60 000.00 has sparked criminal charges and public outrage.

Why estate disputes can ruin a well-laid estate plan

Why estate disputes can ruin a well-laid estate plan

Even with a well-drafted will, disputed claims in an estate can delay the finalisation of a deceased estate and create conflict among beneficiaries. In South Africa, claims like maintenance obligations or accrual rights often survive death and must be addressed by the executor. Proper estate planning, with the guidance of an experienced advisor, helps prevent disputes and safeguards your legacy. In this article, we look at typical disputes that can arise in a deceased estate, and which should be anticipated and planned for.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest