New Public Procurement Bill intended to end tender corruption

To address the continuing perception of tender corruption which has also been included as one of the reasons for South Africa’s grey listing by the international community, the Minister of Finance in May 2023 introduced a draft Public Procurement Bill as the answer to creating conformation, stability and transparency in public procurement across all state entities from national to local government level. The Bill has since been tabled in Parliament.

According to the Bill, Treasury wishes to create a single regulatory system for public procurement that will apply to all entities that fall under the Public Finance Management Act and Municipal Finance Management Act, and in doing so address the abuse and corruption that has accompanied the current decentralised system of procurement.

In embarking on the journey for a uniform procurement system, the Bill makes provision for the establishment of different regulatory bodies. Such bodies include, amongst others, a new Public Procurement Office to promote and implement necessary measures to maintain the integrity of procurement, promote standardisation in procurement and monitor and oversee implementation of the eventual Act.

Also, Provincial Treasuries are targeted as entities that must assist to promote and enforce effective management and transparency in respect of the procurement function of procuring institutions and issue non-binding guidelines to assist procuring institutions in implementation of the Act or any other procurement-related matter. 

The Minister of Finance in turn must prescribe a procurement system and methods for procurement and the Public Procurement Office may, by instruction, determine standard bid documents.  

An interesting part of the Bill is the introduction of the use of technology in procurement. The Public Procurement Office is tasked with developing an information and communication technology-based procurement system for all procurement to enhance efficiencies, effectiveness, transparency and integrity and to combat corruption. Such a system must comprise a single platform that provides access to procurement-related services for officials, bidders, suppliers and members of the public, and must have a uniform procurement procedure component and procurement data to be able to easily report on, analyse, research and deal with oversight of procurement transactions. 

It is clear from the Bill that a substantial overhaul of the public procurement system is envisaged and the free-to-do-as-you-like approach that has existed to date in respect of public procurement will be done away with. Given the extent of the changes envisaged, it is questionable how long it will take before such a centralised process and systems will be actively used, but the intent to centralize, standardize and have proper oversight over all public procurement can only be welcomed.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

July 27, 2023
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest