Contact
Currency gain | Exhange Item | Preference shares | SARS | Taxable gain | Taxable loss

Income Tax Act: Keep an eye on the definition of ‘exchange item’

In the recent 2024 National Budget speech, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana made mention of a possible change to the definition of an “exchange item” for determining taxable exchange gains given that certain financial arrangements are eroding the tax base due to a mismatch in exchange losses and gains when it comes to taxable income.

Section 24I of the current Income Tax Act subjects realised and unrealised gains or losses on “exchange items” to normal income tax. As the act currently stands, an “exchange item” is confined to one of the following:

  • a unit of foreign currency
  • a debt in a foreign currency (this includes loans and advances)
  • a foreign currency forward exchange contract 
  • a foreign currency option contract

This implies all other financial assets such as ordinary or preference shares are excluded from the Section 24I definition of an exchange item meaning that any unrealised currency gains on these items are currently not taxable in South Africa. 

The Finance Minister posited that certain financial arrangements are eroding the tax base due to a mismatch, where some elements of the arrangement yield an exchange loss deduction for tax purposes, whereas exchange gains on other assets in the arrangement are not included in taxable income. This discrepancy according to the Minister appears to be particularly evident in certain preference share financial arrangements. Accordingly, Government proposes to address these tax leakages by extending the definition of an “exchange item” to include shares that are disclosed as financial assets for purposes of IFRS financial reporting.

This may impact on existing financial arrangements and taxpayers would be advised to keep a close eye on developments in this regard. PH Tax & Accounting will also monitor developments to ensure there are no unintended consequences for clients holding financial assets denominated in currencies other than South African Rand.

For queries or assistance with your tax and accounting requirements don’t hesitate to make contact with our Tax & Accounting Team.

 

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).  

April 22, 2024
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , , ,

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , ,

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

by | Jan 16, 2026 | , , ,

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest