More levies under the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act

“I am a sectional title unit owner. I’ve heard a lot of talk about new sectional title legislation on its way that will require me to pay more levies. Is this true?”

The legislation you are referring to is most probably the new Community Schemes Ombud Service Act (“Ombud Service Act”) and in particular new regulations to this Act recently published for comment. The Ombud Service Act together with a closely linked piece of legislation, the Sectional Title Schemes Management Act, have both already been signed by the President in 2011, but have yet to come into operation, primarily to grant time for the necessary infrastructure required by this legislation to be put in place.

The Ombud Service Act specifically makes provision for the establishment of an ombud service to function as a dispute resolution mechanism for sectional title schemes, dealing with issues such as recovery of arear levies, body corporate resolutions etc. In addition, the ombud service will also take over certain of the functions of the Registrar of Deeds in relating to the substitution, adding, amending or repealing of the rules of schemes.

The new proposed regulations to the Ombud Service Act will require sectional title unit owners to pay an additional monthly levy amount, over and above their normal levy, to fund the operational infrastructure of the new ombud service. Where a scheme or owner falls in arrears with this levy, interest will be charged on the arrear amount in terms of the Prescribed Interest Rates Act. The body corporate will also have to take out insurance against the risk of loss of money belonging to the community scheme or for which it is responsible due to fraud or dishonesty, which will have to be funded by the sectional title unit owners. In addition, body corporates must also have a reserve fund. If at the end of the financial year the money in the reserve fund is less than 25 per cent of the total contributions to the scheme’s administrative fund for that year, then, in the next financial year the minimum allocation to the reserve fund must be at least 15 per cent of the total budgeted contribution to the administrative fund. This may also result in schemes having to raise levies in order to meet this new requirement, all of which will impact the pockets of the sectional title unit owner.

The new ombud service levy will be determined with reference to the municipal valuation of your unit. If your unit value falls between R500 001 to R600 000 for example, an owner will have to pay R3.40 per month. The highest amount is capped at R68.00 per month for a unit valued at R2 250 001 to R 2 500 000 and above. Any unit with a total property value not exceeding R500 000 in terms of the municipal valuation roll will be exempt from this monthly levy.

When using the new ombud service to resolve disputes, owners can approach the ombud service directly but will have to pay a nominal fee for their application and adjudication of a dispute, which should be a far cheaper option than court litigation. Any person or group of persons whose monthly net household income is less than R5 500 will also be exempt from paying any of these fees.

This Ombud Service Act has a lot to offer and can positively help address many of the issues arising within sectional titles schemes, often to the disadvantage of the owners living in these schemes. The intent is therefore sound, although only time will tell how effective the proposed structures will be and whether the additional costs sectional title unit owners will have to carry is justified.

December 14, 2015
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest