SARS and B-BBEE Commission working together

“I recently read in the news that the B-BBEE Commission and SARS have entered into a memorandum of understanding. I’m wondering though what these government entities would have in common and why they would want to work together. Can you shed some light on this?”

The B-BBEE Commission was established with the powers to oversee the overall implementation of B-BBEE in South Africa including reviewing BEE transactions entered by South African businesses. Given the strategic benefit of being BEE compliant, many businesses are entering into transactions which fall within the purview of the B-BBEE Commission as regulator of BEE transactions.

It is therefore not surprising that a memorandum of understanding was reached between the B-BBEE Commission and SARS during May 2018, particularly as the B-BBEE Commission has reached similar agreements of co-operation with the Competition Commission, Commission for Employment Equity, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission, South African National Accreditations System and the National Gambling Board since 2017.

The aim of the co-operation agreement between the B-BBEE Commission and SARS is to:

  • Establish co-operation regarding programmes that may directly complement or supplement each other.
  • Refer matters of deemed contraventions that impact on each party’s duties and mandate for consideration and resolution.
  • Identify, discuss and recommend common strategies and areas of co-operation.
  • Share resources, information and expertise that will enhance the organisational strategies and mandates of both parties.

In terms of the memorandum, SARS will share information with the B-BBEE Commission regarding possible fronting practices, non-compliance with the B-BBEE Act and such other information as it may deem necessary, subject to any applicable confidentiality requirements.

In turn, the B-BBEE Commission will provide SARS with information relating to possible suspicious or illegal activities that may impact revenue collection. The B-BBEE Commission will also share information, upon request, relating to major B-BBEE transactions (exceeding R25 million), ownership and management details relating to B-BBEE transactions, complaints received regarding B-BBEE transactions and other relevant information that can assist SARS to conduct tax compliance checks on the entities involved.

This closer working relationship between SARS and B-BBEE Commission requires that parties to a B-BBEE transaction should now make absolutely sure that both the BEE and tax aspects of their transaction are compliant and that the necessary advisors have been consulted in relation to their transaction.

 
September 10, 2018
Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

Out with maternity leave, in with parental leave

A landmark judgment delivered on 3 October 2025 by the Constitutional Court of South Africa has reshaped the legal landscape governing employment and family rights. In Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour; Commission for Gender Equality and Another v Minister of Employment and Labour and Others (CCT 308/23) [2025] ZACC 20, the Court declared several provisions of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA”) and the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 (“UIF Act”) invalid and inconsistent with the Constitution in that they unfairly discriminate between different classes of parents.

AI regulation on the horizon

AI regulation on the horizon

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, and everyday life. We now live in an era where information cannot be trusted at face value, and content creation blurs the lines between reality and fiction. With such a dangerous capability literally at anyone’s fingertips, it is normal to wonder whether AI is being regulated in South Africa. In this article, we look at the current position regarding AI in South Africa.

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

The tax distinction between local and foreign dividends

Dividends from South African resident companies fall under the dividends tax regime and are subject to a 20% withholding tax in terms of section 64E of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“Act”), known as dividends tax, rather than normal income tax. In contrast, foreign dividends are included in a taxpayer’s gross income unless relief is available under section 10B of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, which provides a full or partial participation exemption depending on certain circumstances. In this article, we unpack the important distinction in the tax treatment of local vs foreign dividends in South Africa.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest