Can one email constitute harassment?

"At work one of my colleagues recently replied to an email that I had sent to him, in a terribly derogatory fashion, calling me names and insulting me in a very chauvinistic fashion. He sent his reply to me and many of my colleagues and I am ashamed by what he said and how he riduculed me as a woman in front of my colleagues. I feel victimized by his conduct. But what can I do, it was just an email?”

In terms of the Protection from Harassment Act, 2011 (“the Act”), harassment is seen as conduct that takes place repetitively over a period of time to constitute harassment. However, our courts have recently held that for a victim to be granted protection under the Act, the conduct need not be repetitive in nature and that a victim would be entitled to protection if a single act was of such an overwhelmingly oppressive nature, that it would have the same effect on the victim as to a victim experiencing protracted harassment.

The Act’s definition of harassment includes conduct that a perpetrator knows or ought to know will cause harm, which means any mental, psychological or economic harm or inspires the reasonable belief on the part of the victim that harm will be caused to the victim or any member of his/her family. This can include (but is even wider) unreasonably following, watching, pursuing a person, unreasonable verbal, electronic or other communication and or unreasonable sending of letters, faxes, telegrams, packages, text messages and / or emails to a person, as well as sexual harassment and bullying.

Under the Act, a victim can relatively informal and cost effectively obtain a protection order and enforce such against a perpetrator and have such formally served on them. The Act, unlike the Domestic Violence Act, does not require a “domestic relationship” between the complainant and the perpetrator.

In your situation, the single email of your colleague could constitute harassment under the Act and allow you to consider the remedies afforded under the Act. It would be prudent to consult your attorney to discuss the merits and various options available to you to address the conduct of your colleague before you take any steps.

April 5, 2017
SA’s New Land Court Act – paving the way for settling land disputes

SA’s New Land Court Act – paving the way for settling land disputes

In a quest to remedy historical land injustices and streamline the resolution of land and land rights issues in our country, South Africa has introduced a pioneering piece of legislation namely the new Land Court Act. This Act represents a significant milestone in the ongoing efforts to foster equitable land distribution and provide an effective mechanism for resolving land disputes. The Land Court established by virtue of this transformative legislation will play a central role, as will be outlined in this article.

Construction Contracts: Is it a “one-size-fits-all” decision?

Construction Contracts: Is it a “one-size-fits-all” decision?

Clients often have very different perceptions about the necessity and type of contract they may need for their construction contract. Surprisingly, even with large development projects, there is often the view that if you have the quote and designs, why then bother with a contract? In this article, we provide some guidance on the various types of construction contracts that can be considered for a building project, large or small.

How far does employer liability for the actions of its employee extend?

How far does employer liability for the actions of its employee extend?

It is relatively well-known that employers can be held liable for the conduct of their employees. What is generally less well-understood is the scope of this liability. For example, can an employer be liable for the conduct of an employee whilst on sick leave? In this article, we take a look at an employer’s vicarious liability and how far this liability may extend.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest