How fair must government tenders be?

“My business is growing and I have a good BEE scorecard. It makes sense that I should start looking at getting government work. I’ve been avoiding it because it seems to me that the government entities award tenders to whomever they like. If I go to the trouble of tendering I’d at least like a fair shot at getting the work. Is it worth looking at tenders or should I rather leave it?”

It’s difficult to answer the question of whether you should consider government work. One can point out that our Government spends billions annually through tendered work, and if your business can add value, has a good BEE scorecard and could potentially qualify for tenders there is definitely prospects in exploring tender opportunities.

What I can say is that Section 217(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 requires that when an organ of state in the national, provincial or municipal sphere of government or other government institutions tender for goods or services, it must do so in accordance with a system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective.

These Constitutional principles are further fledged out in Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act 5 of 2000 (“PPPFA”) and its accompanying regulations. Further legislation regulating various government entities (such as the Public Finance Management Act and the Municipal Finance Management Act for example) determine that such entities must have supply chain and procurement policies which regulate their procurement processes. Such policies must meet the requirements of the Constitution and the PPPFA as well as any further regulating legislation, including the provisions of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act. 

What flows as a golden thread through all the procurement principles applicable to government entities is that they are obliged to provide all interested bidders an equal opportunity to be considered and must therefore follow competitive tendering processes to award tenders. Such processes must also include fair and transparent evaluation and award processes to ensure that any bidder is not unfairly prejudiced or benefitted as against other bidders. 

An organ of state, when contracting for goods or services, is therefore required to ensure that the principles enshrined in section 217 of the Constitution are complied with. In ensuring compliance with these principles, there is an obligation which is placed on an organ of state to provide all interested bidders an equal opportunity for consideration. The organ of state must therefore follow a competitive bidding process before selecting a preferred service provider. In short the process and criteria must be fair, objective and impartial and the stipulated procedures as laid out by the relevant policies and governing legislation must be applied consistently.

What this means is that you should in principle have a fair shot at tendering for government work provided you can meet their requirements and criteria and follow the correct procedures. It would also be wise to undertake a study of the relevant procurement policies of the various government entities you may consider to tender for to ensure that you follow their procedures fully and understand their criteria. But are tenders always awarded objectively and fairly? Probably not, but that is why our courts are approached on a regular basis to help determine whether government has fairly applied its mind and to provide bidders an avenue to challenge any tendering processes that they feel did not meet our Constitutionally enshrined principles for public procurement.

April 11, 2019
New SARS reporting puts trusts under the microscope

New SARS reporting puts trusts under the microscope

The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has had trusts under a microscope since April 2023 when the General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Act 22 of 2022 came into full effect. SARS has issued stern warnings to trustees to ensure the accurate and honest submission of trust tax returns and made it abundantly clear that trustees can no longer shift the responsibility of managing a trust’s tax affairs entirely to tax practitioners. Trustees must understand trust-specific tax rules to avoid penalties and legal consequences.

Will AI be steering the future of M&A?

Will AI be steering the future of M&A?

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) will inevitably in some way become part of the day-to-day operations of most businesses. In the fast-paced and competitive world of business, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have long been a vital strategy for companies looking to expand their reach, increase market share, or diversify their portfolios. With the rise of AI, M&A processes may experience significant transformation, even in South Africa, where businesses are increasingly seeking innovative ways to stay competitive and relevant in a strained economy and AI can be instrumental in reshaping how M&A transactions are structured, evaluated, and executed.

Car balloon payments: Pop goes your budget!

Car balloon payments: Pop goes your budget!

A car balloon payment may not be quite as festive as it sounds! Consumers often don’t consider the down-the-road impact of a balloon payment and opt for a lower car instalment now with the worry of the balloon payment left for the future. In this article, we look at the balloon payment structure and what consumers can do to manage this or alternatives that can be considered when procuring a vehicle.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest