How carefully must a trustee step when it comes to buying trust property?

“I’m a trustee on the family trust of a deceased friend where I’ve helped look after the family assets in the trust for his children. Part of the trust property is a beach property that the children want sold and that has been on the market for quite a while. I’ve been toying with the idea of buying the property myself and I’m sure the children wouldn’t mind, but am hesitant to do so because of my position as trustee. Can I consider buying the property from the trust or would that be wrong?”

Because of the unique nature of a trust and also the fiduciary responsibility that a trustee holds in respect of the trust property and trust beneficiaries, buying property from a trust, should rightfully be approached with caution where you are also a trustee of the trust. 

To determine a trustee’s right to benefit from a trust in which he holds the position of trustee, one must carefully look at the fiduciary duties of a trustee. In the first instance, section 9(1) of the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 states that trustees must, in the performance of their duties and in exercising their powers, act with the care, diligence and skill which can reasonably be expected of a person who manages the affairs of another. Secondly, trustees must act in good faith, implying that trustees must always act in the best interests of the beneficiaries.

Accordingly, buying property from a trust could result in a trustee being accused of acting with self-interest and deriving a benefit that is detrimental to the beneficiaries of the trust or of mismanagement of the trust.

To safeguard yourself against such accusations, a trustee may undertake the following steps in mitigation: 

     
•       If you have an interest in the transaction which may affect the trust property, the nature and extent of the interest must be disclosed beforehand to other trustees and trust beneficiaries.
  Carefully review the trust deed to determine whether the sale of property is allowed and in line with the objectives of the trust and whether the powers and duties of the trustees allow such a sale. 
  Obtain legal advice from an independent advisor or obtain leave from the Master of the High Court to purchase the property and confirmation that such purchase will not be detrimental to the trust beneficiaries.
     

Should you feel that it is appropriate for you to consider the purchase of the beach property from the trust, our advice would be to carefully follow the steps above, and only after the appropriateness of the purchase is confirmed, should any offer be made.

September 7, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest