What do I need to keep in mind when appointing an executor in my will?

“I’m getting married soon and know that we are going to have to get a will in place. My friend told me that an important decision is deciding on who the executor of our estate will be. I have no idea though how to decide or what to consider. Can you help?”

Your friend is correct to say that the nomination of your executor is an important aspect of your will. Your executor is nominated in your will and upon your death, he or she will administer and distribute your estate in accordance with your testamentary wishes. Importantly, although you nominate your executor, the executor is only appointed by the Master of the High Court through the issuing of Letters of Executorship after your death.

Your executor will be responsible for, amongst other things:

Interpreting your will
Locating all the beneficiaries
Compiling a list of documents and information required by the Master of the High Court
Collecting information on all the assets and liabilities of the deceased
Calculating and paying estate duty
Allocating inheritances to beneficiaries in accordance with the will

Although it has become a regular practice to appoint a family member as executor, it should be kept in mind that, not only is executorship an onerous and complex task, but in terms of the regulations published by the Minister of Justice, only certain persons may administer estates for remuneration, for example practising accountants, practising attorneys and registered trust companies. 

Another alternative is to have family members nominated as co-executors together with an independent executor. However, this can create complexity which may hamper the speedy administration of your estate.

It should be noted that the Master may in some cases refuse to appoint a nominated executor, or only grant executorship if the executor is assisted by a fiduciary professional or provides security by way of an insurance policy.

It is also important to keep in mind that, should a family member be nominated, this family member will have to make decisions about the administration of the estate during an emotionally difficult time. More often than not, such a decision may be made solely based on fees, without considering whether the appointed agent has the knowledge, skill and testator’s best wishes at heart.

Our advice is to talk to your attorney or consult a fiduciary expert before making the decision of whom to appoint as executor and let them assist you in drafting your will correctly and deciding on whom to nominate as your executor.

November 9, 2018
Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

Checkmate for Pawn Agreements: How the Recent SCA Judgment Protects Consumers from Pawnbroker Profits

In a landmark judgment delivered on 9 April 2025, where VDT Attorneys acted on behalf of the National Credit Regulator, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal (the “SCA”) brought clarity to the rights and obligations of consumers and pawnbrokers when dealing with pawned goods. In the case of The Loan Company (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator and Another (1104/2023) [2025] ZASCA 40, the SCA confirmed a critical principle, i.e. if a pawned asset is sold for more than the outstanding loan and lawful charges, the surplus must be refunded to the consumer. Pawnbrokers cannot lawfully keep the full sale proceeds. This ruling marks a major victory for consumer protection, reinforcing South Africa’s commitment to fairness in credit transactions.

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

Heritage Day: Reflections from a New Breed law firm

On 24 September, we pause to take time off to commemorate Heritage Day, a day enshrined in both our public calendar and the Constitution. A constitutional affirmation of who we are, where we come from, and where we are headed as a nation. As a new breed law firm, we reflect on how the practice of law is intertwined with the heritage of the very people it serves.

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Treasury halts controversial tax proposal on preference shares

Due to the potential adverse investment impact and stakeholder concerns on the proposed amendment to the definition of “hybrid equity instrument” in the 2025 draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (“Bill”), the proposed amendment has been retracted. On 03 September, the National Treasury issued a media statement retracting the proposal to redefine hybrid equity instruments, which has been a relief to all stakeholders.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest