Non-payment of levies is obviously not desirable for a body corporate as levies are critical to the operation of a scheme and non-payment can in time affect scheme maintenance and the overall financial position of the scheme.
That said, it can also be imagined that within reason a body corporate would be willing to settle for settlement of outstanding levies even if the amount is lower than that owed to the body corporate.
But what is the position in law? In a recent High Court judgment in Pietermaritzburg, the court held that trustees of a body corporate do not have the power to agree to such arrangements as there is no provision in the law that allows for the reduction on the amount of levies due and payable by the owner.
On the contrary, the court held that a body corporate is actually supposed to enforce full payment of levies by each owner of a unit. The court further reasoned that a body corporate, by allowing an owner to pay lesser levies than the rest of the owners in the scheme, “undermines the uniformity for the common burden that must be shared by all sectional owners to pay their levies, based on their participation quota. This is an intrinsic component of communal living.”
The court’s view leaves us in no doubt that the default position is that a body corporate cannot engage in any settlement or arrangement by which it accepts less than the full levies due and payable to it.
Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy has been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).