Settle your dispute with a settlement agreement

In dispute resolution matters, the settlement agreement has become an important tool to cut short protracted conflict and litigation and for parties to agree to a full and final settlement of their dispute. In this article, we explore in a bit more detail how and when a settlement agreement should be used to settle a dispute.

A settlement agreement is a legally enforceable contract recording terms agreed upon by disputing parties in an effort to settle the dispute. The settlement agreement will typically deal with agreed-upon concessions and terms and obligations of the parties, including the finality of the dispute, should the parties perform in terms of the settlement agreement.

Although it is not a requirement for settlement agreements to be reduced to writing, it is highly advisable to do so to ensure that the terms of the settlement are fully understood and don’t in turn lead to further disputes.

If litigation has already commenced regarding the dispute at hand, the settlement agreement can be made an order of the court and is enforceable like any other order in that if breached the aggrieved party can apply to the court for a contempt of court order or a right of execution depending on the circumstances.

A court however can only make an order regarding matters placed before it and does not have the power to grant an order regarding a dispute which was not placed before it. What this means is that if settlements were agreed to before the litigation process commenced, such settlements cannot be made an order of the court, as it is not permissible for parties to “freely clothe their agreement” with the severe consequences attached to a court order.

This does not mean that parties cannot conclude a settlement agreement before litigation. It only means that a breach of such an agreement will need to be dealt with as a normal breach of contract.

A court may also decline an application to have an agreement made in an order of court if it finds that the terms contained therein are against public policy. An example of this could be an agreement to not report a crime.

The settlement agreement remains a widely used tool in the dispute resolution space, but care should be taken by parties to not proceed to make concessions and settlements without their attorney who will ensure that the terms of the settlement are correctly reflected in the final settlement agreement, and if appropriate, also made an order of the court.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and is not necessarily that of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without further written confirmation by the author(s).

March 29, 2023
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest