Employment Equity targets are in. Is your business ready?

Following amendments introduced by the Employment Equity Amendment Act 4 of 2022 (“EEAA”), with key provisions that took effect in January 2025, the Minister of Employment and Labour has now published five-year sectoral numerical targets aimed at addressing equitable representation of designated groups in the workplace.

The five-year sectoral numerical targets are only applicable to employers with a workforce of 50 or more employees, classified as “designated employers” per the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA). 

The newly published Employment Equity sectoral numerical targets, effective from 15 April 2025, together with the recently published Employment Equity Regulations, require designated employers to align their Employment Equity plans with the Minister’s specific targets across four upper occupational levels and in eighteen different sectors. 

Favourably, the new targets for suitably qualified people living with a disability have increased from 2% to 3 % across all sectors – a game changer and progressive measure for South Africa’s pursuit of equality. 

Employers will be required to prepare and implement an Employment Equity Plan for the period from 1 September 2025 to 31 August 2030. A designated employer must also submit an annual report to the Director-General on progress towards achieving these targets.

All employers intending on conducting business with an organ of state will be required to, amongst other things, comply with the targets, implement their Employment Equity Plan and obtain a compliance certificate valid for 12 months to avoid termination of their agreement with the state.

Designated employers are required to complete a workplace analysis and formulate revised Employment Equity Plans following the amended legislative framework by no later than 31 August 2025. 

Non-adherence can invite penalties of up to the greater of R2 700 000 or 10% of the employer’s annual turnover, depending on previous contraventions, unless reasonable cause for failure to comply can be demonstrated. 

Importantly, labour inspectors will also be deployed to ensure compliance with the new changes and are mandated to issue compliance orders against defaulting employers, which can potentially result in costly litigation in the Labour Court.

 Employers should act now to review and update their current Employment Equity Plans in line with the newly introduced sectoral targets. With strict deadlines, potential penalties, and increased scrutiny, the question isn’t whether your business should prepare, it’s whether you’re ready.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

August 5, 2025
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest