85 years of expertise

Established in 1932 and having survived, changed, grown and prospered over several decades, we have become a prominent Gauteng firm with a successful track record that knows how to deliver the best results. We have avoided the trap of trying to be and do everything. Instead, we have directed our expertise on becoming the best in our specialities and working with only the top clients all over South Africa.

Our longstanding history speaks for itself regarding the expertise we have amassed and the results we have produced, making us a tried and tested firm that can get the job done, and exceed expectations. 

– We adapt to the needs of clients

We begin by listening to a client before working on delivering a customised solution. By acting on a cutting-edge level of professionalism and with decades of amassed expertise, the firm strives to consistently deliver exceptional service according to the needs of each client. 

With over 80 years of experience, we have grown into a firm with a high level of expertise and an advanced work ethic. Since being established, we have also developed strong professional relationships with significant clients, but have kept our drive for honesty and excellence. Our client relationships are founded on integrity, trust and independence, with a focus on sound financial and ethical policies.  

To uphold our high level of expertise within our firm, we continually develop the skills of our professionals and administrative staff, which is core to allowing the firm to meet the service expectations of clients. The firm also actively explores training initiatives over and above those already in place, to enhance the technical and soft skill levels and experience of our staff.

August 18, 2017
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest