Contact
Phatshoane Henney Group

VDT History and our presence in the Phatshoane Henney Group

VDT Attorneys Inc. was established in 1932, determined to offer tailor-made and effective solutions to any legal problem in a cost-effective manner. We have over the years formed strong professional relationships with our clients and correspondence practices.

Our high level of expertise and advanced work ethic is driven by honesty and excellency founded on integrity, trust and independence, allowing us to deliver only the best results according to sound financial and ethical policies.

To harness our growth, we joined the Phatshoane Henney Group of associated law firms. This Group further guides us as a firm that delivers by fostering five underpinning values:

•    We Care
•    Innovation
•    Standards
•    Expertise
•    Diversity

Our presence as one of 50 law firms in what is South Africa’s largest legal network allows us to pool our knowledge and industry resources through correspondence opportunities to promote the legal profession as one of excellence across the country.

July 4, 2018
When agreements have limits

When agreements have limits

by | Jul 2, 2026 | , ,

Maintenance agreements in South Africa have become increasingly popular between parents of minor children as a means of regulating their respective maintenance obligations outside of court. These agreements are a useful tool, allowing parents to exercise a degree of contractual freedom. However, their provisions remain subject to statutory regulation and the overarching principle that contracts must conform to public policy.

Fee or tax? The court decides

Fee or tax? The court decides

by | Jul 2, 2026 | , ,

With effect from 1 July 2025, the City of Cape Town introduced three new charges on residential rate bills. These charges were challenged by the South African Property Owners’ Association (SAPOA) and AfriForum, who argued that they were unlawful and improperly calculated. The dispute culminated in court applications seeking declaratory orders that the charges were invalid because they were inconsistent with the Constitution, national legislation, and the City’s own By-Laws.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest