Unlocking the Path to Compliance: Navigating South Africa’s Mandatory EPC Requirements for Commercial Property Owners

Attention to all owners of commercial property buildings: Are you aware of the imminent and significant change in South African property law that directly affects you? By December 2025, all non-residential buildings are required to possess Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) as mandated by recent regulations published on 8 December 2020 in the Government Gazette. Failure to comply could result in hefty fines up to R5 million or even imprisonment for five years. These regulations are poised to add further requirements to the conveyancing process and commercial property disposal landscape, introducing new responsibilities that you, as a commercial building owner, need to be aware of.

But what exactly does obtaining an EPC entail, and who will be responsible for ensuring compliance? Let us delve into the basics requirements without overwhelming you with technical jargon.

An EPC is essentially a document that quantifies how much energy your building consumes. It is measured against the South African National Standards (SANS) to determine its energy efficiency rating, which ranges from A (the best) to G (the worst). To obtain this certificate, you will need to enlist the services of a South African National Accreditation System (SANAS) accredited inspection body. These professionals will assess your building’s energy usage, compare it to set standards, and issue the EPC accordingly.

As a building owner or accounting officer, it is your responsibility to register your building’s type and size on the National Building Energy Performance Register (NBEPR) within 12 months of the amended regulation, which came into effect on 3 August 2023. Failure to do so could land you in hot water, facing those aforementioned fines, imprisonment, or even the possibility of these compliance costs being factored into the property transfer expenses. It is, therefore, imperative to take action sooner rather than later.

The cost of obtaining an EPC in South Africa varies between R15 000 and R35 000 (as estimated by an independent contractor), depending on factors such as the size of the building, the type of enterprise or business being conducted at the premises and the age of the structures and installations. This expense is an investment in ensuring your property meets regulatory standards and is energy efficient. Additionally, it is important to note that EPCs must be renewed every five years. However, staying up to date with the maintenance and ensuring no significant changes to the building’s structure, can help reduce the costs over time.

Now, you might be wondering about the implications of these regulations on property transactions. Can conveyancers process transactions without an EPC? The answer is a

resounding no. Without a valid EPC, your property transactions could hit a roadblock, delaying the process, and potentially causing financial losses for the parties involved.

As we approach the deadline for compliance, it is essential to take proactive steps. If you find yourself navigating the complexities of obtaining an EPC, or contemplating the sale of your commercial or industrial building, our offices are here to assist you. Our expertise can guide you through the process, ensuring compliance and a seamless transaction experience.

By Tiaan Koen and Nicola van der Walt

November 18, 2025
Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Section 8C explained: Tax tips for employee share schemes

Employee share schemes are often introduced to reward, retain, or align employees with long-term business growth. However, under section 8C of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (the “Income Tax Act”), these arrangements can create significant and unexpected tax liabilities for employees when equity instruments vest. This article explains how section 8C operates, what qualifies as an “equity instrument,” and why careful structuring of share schemes is essential to avoid punitive tax outcomes.

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The costly consequences of backdated share transactions

The South African legislative framework regards backdated shares as a suspicious and illegal practice, as it arises when a share issue or transfer is recorded as having occurred on an earlier date than the actual transaction. While backdating may be viewed as an administrative oversight, the consequences may constitute compliance risk, serious misconduct on directors, beneficial owners and compliance officers who authorise the backdating of share transactions. This is because backdated shares may manipulate the timing of funds, obscure the source of funds, and distort a company’s beneficial ownership structure.

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Tax transparency matters: Are your deals reportable?

Some deals come with hidden reporting duties. Find out when your transactions could trigger SARS disclosure rules, and how to stay compliant. You may have heard the term “reportable arrangement” in tax conversations around commercial transactions. It sounds technical, and it is, but at its core, it’s about transparency. The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) seeks information on certain transactions that could be used to avoid or reduce tax. If you enter a reportable arrangement, you may be legally required to report it. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest