What will your property transfer cost now?

The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) published its annual update to the conveyancing fee guidelines. These revised tariffs, effective from 1 August 2025, now apply to all new instructions received on or after that date. The adjustments reflect an average increase of approximately 3.2% across most categories and include updated figures for property transfers, […]

The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) published its annual update to the conveyancing fee guidelines. These revised tariffs, effective from 1 August 2025, now apply to all new instructions received on or after that date. The adjustments reflect an average increase of approximately 3.2% across most categories and include updated figures for property transfers, mortgage bond registrations, and several other related legal services. 

Conveyancing fees in South Africa are calculated using a sliding scale based on the value of the property or bond. The updated scales, effective from 1 August 2025, are as follows:

Value of property or bond           Recommended fee
R100 000.00 or lessR6 640.00
Over R100 000.00 up to and including R500 000.00R6 640.00 plus R1 060.00 per R50 000.00 or part thereof above that
Over R500 000 up to and including R1 000 000.00R15 120.00 for the first R500 000.00 plus R2 050.00 per R100 000.00 or part thereof above that
Over R1 000 000.00 up to and including R5 000 000.00R25 370.00 for the first R1 000 000.00 plus R2 050.00 per R200 000.00 or part thereof above that
Over R5 000 000.00R66 370.00 for the first R5 000 000.00 plus R5 160.00 per R1 000 000.00 or part thereof above that

To illustrate how the sliding scale would apply, a property purchased for R800 000.00 would fall within the R500 000 to R1 000 000 bracket. The fee would thus be calculated as R15 120.00 plus R2 050.00 multiplied by three (to account for the R300 000 above R500 000), resulting in a total fee of R21 270.00. 

It is important to note that these are only the recommended professional fees. Additional charges such as disbursements, other expenses and VAT will typically be charged by the conveyancer in addition to the professional fee, depending on the particulars of the transaction.

The LSSA has emphasised that these fees do not constitute minimum or maximum rates, but guidelines issued to promote consistency and transparency in the profession. These fees remain negotiable between conveyancers and their clients and are intended to assist both legal practitioners and the public in anticipating transaction costs. 

Other fee increases introduced in this update include the drafting and registration of an antenuptial contract, which has increased from R3 020.00 to R3 120.00. The fee for obtaining consent to cancel a bond has increased from R3 160.00 to R3 260.00. The fee for acquiring a certificate in terms of section 42(2) of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965, required in deceased estate sales, has increased from R4 545.00 to R4 690.00. Additionally, the cost of applying for a certified copy of a lost title deed in terms of regulation 68(1) has increased from R3 160.00 to R3 260.00.

The full schedule of recommended conveyancing fees is available for download on the LSSA website at https://www.lssa.org.za/legal-practitioners/resources/. 

Clients and other property professionals should contact their attorney or property professional should they require a detailed breakdown of transfer and/or bond registration costs where the property value or purchase price is available.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author(s) and does not necessarily present the views of the firm. The content is provided for information only and should not be seen as an exact or complete exposition of the law. Accordingly, no reliance should be placed on the content for any reason whatsoever, and no action should be taken on the basis thereof unless its application and accuracy have been confirmed by a legal advisor. The firm and author(s) cannot be held liable for any prejudice or damage resulting from action taken based on this content without further written confirmation by the author(s). 

October 1, 2025
Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Culture vs style: When workplace dress codes cross the line

Dress codes are a familiar part of many workplaces, yet employers often fail to calibrate how far they are allowed to go in regulating employee personal appearance. While employers may enforce standards of neatness, safety and professionalism, these rules cannot override constitutional rights, nor can they operate in a discriminatory manner. A recent reminder of this emerged from the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the court had to consider the fairness of dismissing correctional officers for refusing to cut their dreadlocks, contrary to the employer’s dress code.

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

Competition Commission guidelines on confidential information

The Competition Commission of South Africa (“Competition Commission”) identified a need to guide merger parties and stakeholders on claiming confidentiality over information. In September 2025, the Competition Commission issued Guidelines on the Commission’s handling of confidential information (“Guidelines”), which, however, are not binding on the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court, but must be taken into account by these authorities when interpreting and applying the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act”).

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

Termination of joint ownership, rights in question: PIE Act explained

In a recent Western Cape court case where the court ordered the termination of joint ownership of properties, an interesting question arose as to whether the termination of joint ownership did not amount to an eviction contrary to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, 19 of 1998 (PIE Act)? We look at the requirements for the termination of joint ownership by our courts and whether this can infringe on the PIE Act.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest