How should co-executors of a deceased estate act?

“My mother and I have been appointed as co-executors of my late father’s estate. My mother wants to sell our family home, but I don’t want to. She has however gone ahead and signed a sale agreement without my consent. Can she do this and sell the house without my approval?”

Where immovable property has been acquired by a person during their lifetime and such person passes away, the property forms part of that person’s estate and must be administered according to his will. The deceased can nominate one or more persons in his will to administer his estate accordingly upon his death. Such a person is termed an “executor” and where there are two or more executors, they are referred to as co-executors. 

Co-executors must always act jointly as they are charged with the duty to properly administer the estate from start to finish. An executor therefore, may not enter into an agreement with a third party without the other co-executor. 

Our courts have accordingly held that where several executors are appointed each is responsible for the due administration of the estate. This means that co-executors must act jointly and are jointly responsible to carry out the wishes of the deceased, until the Master releases them from such duty. The relationship of co-executors is also different to that of a partnership. With a partnership a partner can act and sign a sale agreement on behalf of the others. In the case of co-executors, they must always act jointly as they are both equally responsible for the administration of the estate.

In your case it therefore means, that your mother cannot sell the family home without your consent and any agreement entered into will not be valid as she does not have the authority to bind the estate without your consent as co-executor.

December 14, 2021
When agreements have limits

When agreements have limits

Maintenance agreements in South Africa have become increasingly popular between parents of minor children as a means of regulating their respective maintenance obligations outside of court. These agreements are a useful tool, allowing parents to exercise a degree of contractual freedom. However, their provisions remain subject to statutory regulation and the overarching principle that contracts must conform to public policy.

Fee or tax? The court decides

Fee or tax? The court decides

With effect from 1 July 2025, the City of Cape Town introduced three new charges on residential rate bills. These charges were challenged by the South African Property Owners’ Association (SAPOA) and AfriForum, who argued that they were unlawful and improperly calculated. The dispute culminated in court applications seeking declaratory orders that the charges were invalid because they were inconsistent with the Constitution, national legislation, and the City’s own By-Laws.

Sign up to our newsletter

Pin It on Pinterest